The affirmative defense of necessity bars the prosecution of the defendant if it is established.
When is it appropriate to assert a necessity defense?These components are often present in a defense of duress: The performer is immediately in danger of dying or suffering grave physical harm. The only plausible option for the actor to get away is to commit the illegal act.
Shoving someone off of another person when they were threatening to kill that person would be an illustration of need. The shoving is justified as necessary because it does less harm than killing would.
When an action cannot be avoided and it is justifiable because it will stop a more significant harm from happening, it is a defense to culpability for unlawful actions.
To learn more about necessity defense refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29893642
#SPJ1
Fawn cannot raise the defense of necessity if she is charged with a crime.
If Fawn is charged with a crime can she raise the defense of necessity?No, Fawn cannot raise the defense of necessity.The defense of necessity requires the accused to prove that the harm caused was less than the harm avoided by breaking the law.In this situation, Fawn avoided hitting the students by swerving and hitting the other car, but this is still an illegal act and does not constitute a defense of necessity.Necessity is a legal defense that is available in some criminal cases and is based on the idea that the defendant had no other reasonable choice but to commit the crime in order to prevent a greater harm from occurring.In order for Fawn to use the defense, she must show that the harm she was trying to prevent was greater than the harm caused by the crime she committed.In this case, Fawn swerved to avoid the students, which caused her to hit the other car. While Fawn’s intention was to prevent a greater harm from occurring, the harm she caused was greater than the harm she was trying to prevent, as she caused property damage and potentially physical harm by hitting the other car.Therefore, Fawn cannot use the defense of necessity if she is charged with a crime.The defense of necessity is a type of excuse defense.To learn more about The defense of necessity refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30021859
#SPJ1
what is the free exercise clause of the first amendment
The Free Exercise Clause is a provision of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution that protects an individual's right to practice their religion freely without government interference. Here are some key points to consider:
What is first amendment?The Free Exercise Clause states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."This means that the government cannot establish an official state religion, and it cannot prevent individuals from freely practicing their chosen religion.The Free Exercise Clause applies to all religions, not just those that are traditionally recognized or popular in the United States.It protects not only the right to believe in a certain religion, but also the right to act on those beliefs.The Free Exercise Clause has been interpreted by the courts to include not only religious beliefs but also religious practices.The Supreme Court has also recognized that the clause does not protect every religious practice, and that laws that are neutral and generally applicable can be enforced even if they burden a person's religious practices.The Free Exercise Clause is not absolute, and it can be limited when it conflicts with other important government interests, such as public safety, health, and welfare.The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment is one of the most important protections of religious freedom in the United States, but it is not without limits. The courts have had to balance the right to freedom of religion with other important government interests, such as public safety and welfare.To learn more about first amendment refer:
brainly.com/question/9194486
#SPJ4
true/false. consider a recent event, either in your personal life or in the news. in a few sentences, describe how basic knowledge of the social sciences could help you better understand that event, make decisions, or act.
A variety of academic disciplines known as the social sciences are primarily concerned with societal inquiry. It investigates human nature, interpersonal interactions, cultural development, and global impact.
In other terms, social science offers knowledge about how society works. Social scientists' ideas are being used by several business and public sector groups to address a variety of issues, including poverty and child development, among others. Social sciences can also be applied personally. For instance, history, anthropology, or archaeology can be used to understand how humans have developed tools over time. Understanding one's psychological requirements and how to meet them is made possible by subjects like psychology. Take the current Israel-Palestine conflict as an example. Many individuals believe that Palestine and Mossad are the causes. Different perspectives on these confrontations paint a vivid picture of how different people might interpret the same incident in different ways.
Learn more about social science here
https://brainly.com/question/17260532
#SPJ4
When a court can hear a case for the first time it is known as what?.
Answer:
original jurisdiction
which statement provides evidence that congress is fulfillung its responsibilities as the legislative branch of government
this is the explanation
Employers must verify that employment candidates are eligible to work in the U.S. as mandated by the:
a. Manpower Development and Training Act.
b. Civil Rights Act of 1991.
c. Immigration Reform and Control Act.
d. Occupational Safety and Health Act.
Answer:
C. Immigration Reform and Control Act.
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
Answer this question in at least 4 sentences.
14. Explain how a supreme court's ruling and precedents can change over
time. Be sure to identify who has the authority to establish a new
precedent, and provide an example of a precedent that changed.
Answer this question in at least 4 sentences.
A Supreme Court's ruling and precedents can change over time as the court reassesses and reinterprets the law in light of new social and legal developments. The Supreme Court has the authority to establish new precedents, through their decisions and rulings that set legal principles that must be followed by lower courts. A precedent can change when a new case is brought before the court, and the court reconsiders its previous ruling, or when the court's composition changes and new justices bring new perspectives to the court.
An example of a precedent that changed over time is the "separate but equal" doctrine. This doctrine, established in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality. However, in the 1954 case of Brown v. Board of Education, the court reversed this precedent and ruled that segregation in public schools was inherently unequal, and therefore unconstitutional.
bill is trying to sell his house in oklahoma city, oklahoma to george, who lives in little rock, arkansas. they have a dispute over the terms of the contract, and bill decides to sue george. which of the following statements is true in this scenario? A) The Arkansas state court has in rem jurisdiction to hear this case.
B) The Oklahoma state court does not have jurisdiction to hear this case as the defendant is from another state.
C)The Oklahoma state court has in rem jurisdiction to hear this case.
D)The Arkansas court will hear this case as it has in personam jurisdiction over George.
Option c is Correct. George, who resides in Little Rock, Arkansas, is the buyer for Bill's home in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. They disagree on the contract's provisions, so Bill decides to sue George.
The following conditions must be met in order for the Oklahoma state court to have in rem jurisdiction over this matter. The majority opinion, which wins a majority vote from the justices or judges hearing the case, is an appellate opinion supporting the court's judgment (the outcome reached in the case).
A judicial judgment is considered to be a "majority opinion" if more than half of the judges who are reviewing the case concur. An appellate judge who sided with the majority would express their unique legal position in a "concurring opinion," also known as concurrence.
Learn more about Oklahoma Visit: brainly.com/question/25377599
#SPJ4
which of the following writers would least likely support the goals of wollstonecraft? group of answer choices a conservative absolutist an abolitionist a classical liberal a utopian socialist
A Conservative would least likely support the goals of Wollstonecraft. Wollstonecraft held that human conduct was influenced by the environment rather than by genetics.
Mary Wollstonecraft, also known by her married name Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin, was an English writer and ardent supporter of women's equality in society and education. She was born in London, England, on April 27, 1759, and died there on September 10, 1797. In A Affirmation of the Woman Rights(1792), regarded as a classic of feminism, she expressed her convictions. A cultural, political, and social worldview known as conservatism aims to uphold and support established institutions, customs, and values. Depending on the culture and civilization in which it manifests, conservatism's core principles can change. Conservatives in Western civilization work to protect a variety of institutions, including parliamentary government, organized religion, and property rights. Institutions and behaviors that provide stability and have developed gradually are typically preferred by conservatives.
Learn more about Wollstonecraft here
https://brainly.com/question/24234056
#SPJ4
The term entrapment refers to an incident wherein an otherwise innocent person commits an illegal act because of which of the following?O Excessive; Illegal.O Police officers need to be selective.O Racial profiling; Differential discretion for petty crimes.O The person was enticed by the police.
Threats, intimidation, prolonged fraud, and other tactics that effectively coerced the defendant into committing a crime are all examples of entrapment.
What does entrapment mean legally?Threats, intimidation, prolonged deception, or any other tactic where the defendant was basically coerced into committing a crime, can all lead to entrapment.
Entrapment is the term used to describe a situation in which a typically law-abiding person is coerced into committing a crime that they otherwise would not have done by overwhelming pestering, deception, flattery, or threats from a recognized police source.
Entrapment is the term used to describe a situation in which a law-abiding individual is coerced into carrying out a criminal conduct by authorities. Finding out if entrapment has taken place can be done in two different ways. the two approaches: the objective and the subjective.
To learn more about entrapment refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14445589
#SPJ4
if an insane person who has not been adjudged insane enters into a contract, the contract is non-voidable by the insane person.TrueFalse
A contract signed by someone who has been deemed mad is invalid. being crazy without being declared mad by a court or administrative body.
Which of the following is true of a contract with an adjudged insane person?A person who has been deemed mad cannot enter into a contract. not having had one's insanity determined by a court or other official body. Such a person often renders voidable any deal they enter into. It is an invalid contract in some states.
A person who has been declared mad cannot enter into a contract. Consequently, there isn't a contract. Only the court-appointed guardian is permitted by law to sign contracts on behalf of a person who has been determined to be crazy.
A person who has been deemed mad cannot enter into a contract. If a person has a mental condition that qualifies him or her as legally insane but no formal determination of their sanity has been made that person is insane, yet they have not yet been found to be insane. The mad person can void the agreement.
To learn more about contract refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/17185606
#SPJ4
which paragraph explains what locke believe should happen if the government does not protect people's rights?
John Locke, a 17th century philosopher, believed that people have certain natural rights that governments are obligated to protect.
What Locke believe should happen if the government does not protect people's rights?According to Locke, if a government fails to protect these rights, the people have the right to overthrow that government and establish a new one that will better protect their rights.Locke believed that the ultimate goal of government is to protect the life, liberty, and property of its citizens.He also believed that the government's authority comes from the consent of the governed, and if the government fails to fulfill its duty to protect the rights of its citizens, the people have the right to withdraw their consent and establish a new government that will better serve their needs.In summary, Locke believed that if the government does not protect people's rights, the people have the right to revolt and establish a new government that will better protect their rights and serve their needs.To learn more about Locke's belief refer:
brainly.com/question/30277155
#SPJ4
Which of the following arguments about Reconstruction policies would both authors most likely disagree with? With Republicans in retreat, Southern Democrats grew more supportive of Reconstruction policies
With Republicans in retreat, Southern Democrats grew more supportive of Reconstruction policies. This is the argument that authors most likely disagree with.
The Reconstruction Policies were pieces of American legislation passed in 1867 and 1868 that set the terms for the Southern states' readmission to the Union after the American Civil War (1861–65).
The Radical Republicans in the US Congress wrote the bills in significantly.
The discussion over how the former Confederate states would re-join the United States heated up after the war ended in 1865.
President Andrew Johnson said he would pursue Reconstruction measures that were even more lenient than those of his predecessor, Abraham Lincoln.
The Radical Republicans, a potent anti-slavery group in Congress that was dedicated to enfranchisement and equal rights for freed blacks, however, opposed him. These lawmakers favoured stricter regulations, and they were largely responsible for creating the Reconstruction Act.
To know more about Reconstruction policies, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17588287
#SPJ4
which of the following best explains the success of federal efforts to get states to raise the drinking age to 21?
The federal government's use of crossover sanctions best explains the success of federal efforts to get states to raise the drinking age to 21.
What do you know about federal government?
In a sense, a federal government is a structure created to transfer power from the wealthy to the underprivileged. The bigger, more powerful central government of a country shares power with the nation's smaller state and regional administrations. This is accomplished by giving each sector specific duties so that the federal government, as well as the state and municipal governments, each have their own tasks to do.
The Constitution of the United States mandates that the federal government can continue to exercise authority over a number of activities, including, to mention a few, the establishment of lower courts, the issuance of patents, and the production of money. The authority to declare war is another example of a federal government obligation.
To learn more about federal government
https://brainly.com/question/28179931
#SPJ1
it is an assertion of authority by a peace officer that would cause a reasonable person to believe they are not free to leave. a/an same answer is limited in scope, intensity, and duration. it is less than an arrest and more substantial than a consensual encounter. *
An assertion of power by a peace officer that would lead a reasonable person to believe they are not free to depart is considered a temporary detention or stop.
Superintendent: It is up to you to decide whether to grant a second, potentially three-month bail period. District/Branch Commanders: You are in charge of overseeing investigations in when a suspect has been released on police bail or while being investigated.
No one should be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment while in any form of detention or incarceration, and no cause whatsoever shall be cited as a defense for such treatment or punishment.
Learn more about authority Visit: brainly.com/question/28067297
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements about policy agendas is FALSE?A) Interest groups, political parties, and the president are all examples of those who pushfor their priorities to take precedence.B) Scores of issues compete for attention from the government.C) The policy agenda receives some serious attention at any given time.D) Only government officials develop policy priorities.E) none of the above
The correct response is D) Only government officials develop policy priorities.
A predefined set of guidelines designed to guide decisions and yield rational outcomes is known as a policy. A policy is a statement of intent that is put into action through a procedure or routine. Usually, a company's governance body enacts policies. Policies can help both logical and irrational decision-making. Policies used in subjective decision-making typically help senior management with choices that must be based on the relative merits of a number of elements, and as a result, are frequently challenging to assess objectively, for example, work-life balance policies. Governments and other institutions also have policies in the form of laws, rules, guidelines, administrative procedures, financial incentives, and voluntary activities. Resource distributions frequently reflect political choices. The repetitive and routine organizational actions are outlined in policy. In contrast, operational rules that support objective decision-making tend to be testable, like password policies, and are typically operational in nature.
Learn more about policy here
https://brainly.com/question/28884301
#SPJ4
If your license has been suspended, you must do the following to reinstate your license
Answer:
The steps to reinstate a suspended license can vary depending on the reason for the suspension and the state in which you live. However, some common steps that may be required include:
Paying any outstanding fines or fees associated with the suspension
Completing any required court-ordered classes or programs
Completing any required community service
Providing proof of insurance if the suspension was related to a car accident or traffic violation
Passing any required driving tests or vehicle inspections
Paying a reinstatement fee to the state Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
It's important to check with your state's DMV for specific instructions and requirements for reinstating a suspended license. Some states may also require an SR-22 form, a document proving that you have the required insurance for your state.
which of the following types of presidential powers has been consistently used by president trump to circumvent congress?
Answer:
Executive orders.
Explanation:
Trump has used many executive orders to circumvent congress.
what is the structure of the georgia constitution?
The preamble, the bill of rights, the 11 articles, and the modifications make up the constitution's fundamental framework. The preamble is a succinct declaration that states the underlying goals and tenets that the Georgia Constitution upholds.
The guiding ideas are checks and balances, limited government, federalism, power division among the three arms of the government, and individual rights. The Preamble, seven articles, and amendments make up the Constitution's three main sections. The Preamble, or introduction, describes the basic goal of the U.S. georgia Constitution and the justification for its creation. With a system of checks and balances between the three branches, it first establishes a national government with a legislative, executive, and judicial branch. It also divides authority between the federal government and the state governments. states. Third, it safeguards the diverse personal freedoms of American citizens. The dignity and freedom of its citizens, which are of utmost significance and cannot be compromised by any act passed by the parliament, are the fundamental cornerstone of the constitution. The Judiciary has not provided a clear definition of the fundamental elements of the Constitution.
Learn more about georgia here :
https://brainly.com/question/15608087
#SPJ4
the following are considerations when planning for operational contract support (ocs): (select all that apply)
1. Over-flight rights and access transit authorities, 2. Infrastructure, 3. Alternate aerial or sea ports of embarkment/debarkment (POE/POD).
What is contract?
A contract is a written agreement that clearly states certain legally binding rights and obligations for two or more mutually agreeing parties. A contract usually involves the exchange of goods, services, or money, or the promise to exchange any of these at a later date.
When constructing any structure, whether a skyscraper or a startup, you must start with a plan and a foundation. Contracts are used by businesses to establish the foundation of their professional relationships while also providing the agreed-upon procedures that govern those relationships. A contract establishes how the parties will collaborate and how each party's duties and responsibilities will be tracked and enforced.
To learn more about contract refer to:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ4
Not yielding to visually impaired pedestrians is a misdemeanor. True or False?
This statement is "Not yielding to visually impaired pedestrians is a misdemeanor" is true as per the law under the vehicle code.
Chapter 5 Pedestrian Rights and Duties of DIVISION 11. RULES OF THE ROAD in the Vehicle code talk about the punishment that is to be imposed on a driver when he does not yield to a visually impaired pedestrian.
It states that a driver of any approaching vehicle who fails to yield the right-of-way to a totally or partially blind pedestrian who is carrying a predominantly white cane or using a guide dog, or who fails to take all reasonably necessary precautions to avoid injuring this blind pedestrian, is guilty of a misdemeanor.
He also remains punishable by up to six months in county jail or a fine of at least $500. The prosecution of an offence under any other appropriate legal requirement is not prohibited by this clause.
To know more about misdemeanor, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30175834
#SPJ4
_____ are the broad and enduring purposes for which the Services and the Combatant commands (or CCMDs) were established by law.
Roles are the broad and enduring purposes for which the Services and the Combatant commands (or CCMDs) were established by law.
A combatant command, sometimes known as a unified combatant command (CCMD), is a combined military command of the United States Department of Defense that is made up of forces from two or more service branches of the United States Armed Forces and carries out extensive and ongoing operations. Currently, there are 11 unified combatant commands, each of which is the top tier of military commands and is responsible for providing effective command and control of all U.S. military forces, regardless of branch of service, in times of peace or conflict. Unified combatant commands are set up either geographically (under the term "area of responsibility," or AOR) or functionally, for example, in the areas of special operations, force projection, transport, and cybersecurity.
Learn more about Combatant commands here
https://brainly.com/question/17205679
#SPJ4
1. The Supreme Court decided that (select 2 of the following answer options): a. The search was unconstitutional. B. A warrant was required for regulatory inspections of gun dealers. C. The appellate court ruling should be overturned. D. Biswell's consent is required for the search to be constitutional. E. Regulatory inspections for gun sale violations do not create privacy issues
The correct response is B. A warrant was required for regulatory inspections of gun dealers.
A warrant is a legal document that gives authorization for someone to do something, particularly one that is approved by a judge or magistrate and enables the police to make an arrest or search a person's home. There is a warrant out for his arrest, according to the police. The premise on which the allegation and the supporting evidence are based is the warrant. The warrant also provides an explanation of how the information supports the claim. The judge must then issue the warrant, which must essentially take the form specified by the Rules; search warrants must be issued in duplicate. If the judge is then convinced that the facts supporting the application are true, or that there is reasonable grounds to believe that they are, he must do so.
Learn more about warrant here
https://brainly.com/question/12863886
#SPJ4
What is the conclusion in the Aetna v. Pendleton Detectives of Miss. case?
The conclusion of the Aetna v. Pendleton Detectives of Miss. case is that the court found in favor of Aetna. The court held that Pendleton Detectives of Mississippi had breached its contract with Aetna by failing to provide the services that were agreed upon in the contract.
What is law of contract?The law of contract is a body of law that governs the formation and enforcement of contracts between two or more parties. It sets out the rights and obligations of each party to the agreement, and provides remedies for breach of contract. It also establishes the conditions under which a contract can be considered legally valid.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about law of contract: https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
ready to eat tcs food must be marked with the date by which it must be sold t or f
Food that has been chilled and is ready to eat (TCS) and stored for more than 24 hours needs to be date-marked to make sure it's consumed there, sold, or thrown out within 7 days.
Raw, cooked, or partially cooked animal products, such as milk, meat, poultry, eggs, or other dairy products. prepared plant-based food, including pasta, potatoes, and rice. foods made from plants, like raw seed sprouts, melons, tomatoes, and leafy greens. The term "temperature danger zone" refers to the range of temperatures when disease-causing bacteria flourish in TCS food. 41 to 135 degrees Fahrenheit is the danger zone for temperatures. The temperature danger zone must be passed by TCS food as rapidly as feasible. Always keep hot food hot and cold food cold. Milk and dairy products, eggs, meat (beef, pig, and lamb), poultry, fish, shellfish, and crustaceans are examples of foods that need time and temperature control for safety, or TCS foods.
Learn more about TCS here
https://brainly.com/question/4028547
#SPJ4
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 offers a list of benefits to plan participants. Which of the following items is not among the list?Age discrimination is not permittedDB plan participants need a periodic notice of the plans asset-level relative to their liability-level.Automatic enrollment is not encourage because it violates freedom of choice.DC plan participants need to receive quarterly statements is they direct their own investment decisions.
Answer:
Automatic enrollment is not encouraged because it violated freedom of choice.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
If you could remove from the Texa criminal code, what law would you remove and why?
I would remove "False report to peace officer" law from Texas criminal code because it is punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a fine up to $2,000 and discourages people to file reports and doubt the police.
The False Report to Peace Officer law from the Texas criminal code should be removed due to its disproportionate punishments and its potential to discourage citizens from filing reports or expressing doubt in the police. Under the current law, the penalty for filing a false report can be up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
These severe penalties have the potential to create a hostile relationship between citizens and police, as individuals may be discouraged from filing reports out of fear of punishment or doubt in the police. For these reasons, it is essential to remove this law in order to ensure that citizens can feel safe filing reports and expressing their concerns.
To know more about Texas, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/29991787
#SPJ4
standard of practice 12-6 of the realtors® code of ethics requires realtors®
The Code mandates that REALTORS respect the agency ties that other REALTORS have with their clients.
What is Code of Ethics in real estate?
According to the Code, REALTORS are expected to respect the agency arrangements that other REALTORS have with their clients. T** F 13. The Code of Ethics forbids embellishing, misrepresenting, and hiding material information about the property or the transaction. For realtor business conduct, the NAR Code of Ethics sets the bar. Its 17 articles lay out expectations for behavior with clients, consumers, the general public, and fellow realtors.
One of the earliest codes of conduct to be approved by a commercial organization was the NAR Code of Ethics, which was established in 1913. By forcing REALTORS® to work together to advance the best interests of clients, the Code ensures that customers are well-served.
To learn more about REALTORS refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29993418
#SPJ4
The Code mandates that REALTORS respect the agency ties that other REALTORS have with their clients.
What is Code of Ethics in real estate?According to the Code, REALTORS are expected to respect the agency arrangements that other REALTORS have with their clients. T** F 13. The Code of Ethics forbids embellishing, misrepresenting, and hiding material information about the property or the transaction. For realtor business conduct, the NAR Code of Ethics sets the bar. Its 17 articles lay out expectations for behavior with clients, consumers, the general public, and fellow realtors.
One of the earliest codes of conduct to be approved by a commercial organization was the NAR Code of Ethics, which was established in 1913. By forcing REALTORS® to work together to advance the best interests of clients, the Code ensures that customers are well-served.
To learn more about REALTORS refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30093332
#SPJ4
TRUE OR FALSE medical payments coverage helps pay for medical, dental, and funeral expenses for people riding in your covered vehicle, regardless of who is at fault.
True, Medical payments coverage (Med Pay) helps pay for medical, dental, and funeral expenses for people riding in your covered vehicle, regardless of who is at fault.
What is Med pay and how its useful?
Med Pay is an optional coverage offered by auto insurance companies that helps pay for medical expenses for anyone injured in an accident involving your covered vehicle.
Med Pay coverage is paid in addition to any liability coverage you may have, and it can be used to pay for medical expenses such as hospital stays, surgical procedures, and therapy sessions.
Med Pay can also be used to pay for dental expenses, such as tooth repair or replacement, and funeral expenses, in the event of a fatal accident.
Med Pay is usually offered in small dollar amounts, like $1,000, $5,000, or $10,000, and the amount of coverage you choose will determine how much you pay in premiums.
Med Pay is designed to help pay for medical expenses quickly, without the need to wait for a liability determination to be made.
In summary, Medical payments coverage (Med Pay) is an optional coverage offered by auto insurance companies.
It helps pay for medical, dental, and funeral expenses for people riding in your covered vehicle, regardless of who is at fault.
Med Pay is paid in addition to any liability coverage you may have and is designed to help pay for medical expenses quickly.
To learn more about Med pay refer:
brainly.com/question/13960193
#SPJ4
as part of your h-1b employment, will you work from your u.s. residence address (work from home) on a regular basis
If your home address is permanently stated on your H1B petition as the "work location," you are permitted to work from home. You must submit an H1B Amendment to USCIS in order to obtain approval for remote employment if your current authorized H1B does not include your home address.
An appeal for action is made through a petition, usually to a prominent figure or elected official. Supplication is a type of prayer in which one makes demands of a deity. According to the traditional definition, a petition is a letter addressed to an official that has received numerous signatures. A petition can also be delivered verbally or online instead of in writing. The name of the legal pleading that starts a case, Legal Petition, is another option. In most American courts, a complaint is the first document filed in a civil action that solely asks for monetary compensation (damages). In contrast, a petition is the opening complaint in a case that asks for non-financial or "equitable" remedy, such as a writ of mandamus or habeas corpus, child custody, or will probate. Act on petition is a "summary method" that is used in divorce, ecclesiastical, and probate proceedings to handle issues that are too complicated for a simple motion. In a case, the parties trade pleadings up until a hearing issue is resolved.
Learn more about petition here
https://brainly.com/question/24723170
#SPJ4
the equal protection standard is generally judged in a lenient manner. however, laws that discriminate regarding are made to undergo a much more rigorous test.
The equal protection standard is generally judged in a lenient manner. However, laws that discriminate regarding race are made to undergo a much more rigorous test.
What is equal protection standard?According to the principle of equal protection, no one may be denied the same access to the legal system. A person must be treated equally to others in comparable situations by the state's governing body. In addition, no state may take away someone's life, liberty, or property without providing them with a fair trial or deny them the equal protection of the law if they are a resident of its territory. No State shall pass or enforce any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens.The government is prohibited from enacting laws or adopting official measures that differ in how they treat individuals in identical situations or groups of individuals under the equal protection clause of the constitution.
To learn more about equal protection standard refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28474671
#SPJ4
