In a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.

Answer:

Answer:

safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v

Explanation:

The sum of the forces on either side is the same, the only difference is the radius of curvature and speed.

Also given that r_1= smaller radius

r_2= larger radius curve

r_2= 2r_1..............i

let u be the speed of larger radius curve

now, \sum F = \frac{mv^2}{r_1} =\frac{mu^2}{r_2}∑F=

r

1

mv

2

=

r

2

mu

2

................ii

form i and ii we can write

v^2= \frac{1}{2} u^2v

2

=

2

1

u

2

⇒u= √2 v

therefore, safe speed for the larger radius track u= √2 v

Considering the legal practice and standards, it is false that in a case involving internet transactions, jurisdiction is proper only when the defendant conducts substantial business in the jurisdiction online.

Jurisdiction online transaction is a legal issue that seeks to solve or justify court jurisdiction over a case or dispute involving a foreign defendant.

In this case, the normal principle state that having a foreign defendant access a website is not satisfactory to establish jurisdiction.

Therefore, for a court to justify exercising jurisdiction over a foreign defendant in Internet-based transactions, there must be multiple contacts in addition to the accessibility of a website.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "False."

Learn more about Jurisdiction of court here: https://brainly.com/question/10377896

The individual who proposed principles such as the power to govern should be from
the people, that government should not hold all power over the people, and that it
should have a system of checks and balances divided amongst its various branches
was