Lacey files a civil suit against Mischa. To succeed, Lacey must prove her case- b) by a preponderance of the evidence. One kind of evidential criterion utilized in a burden of proof assessment is the preponderance of the evidence.
According to the preponderance standard, the proof burden is satisfied when the party presenting it persuades the fact-finder that the claim has a higher than 50% chance of being true. In a civil trial, the proof burden is this. To establish anything by a majority of the evidence is to merely demonstrate that it is more probable than not. Do you think that each part of his or her [assertion] is more probably correct than false in view of the evidence as well as the law, to put it another way.
To know more about evidence:
https://brainly.com/question/14370298
#SPJ4
to reduce the loss of life and property and to protect a nation's institutions from all types of hazards.
In order to secure a country's institutions from all threats, emergency preparedness entails taking proactive steps to reduce the loss of life and property.
The phrase describes the measures you take to ensure your safety before, during, and after a crisis or natural disaster. These preparations are crucial for your safety during both natural and man-made disasters. An emergency plan outlines how to deal with abrupt or unforeseen crises, according to the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. To be prepared to: Prevent fatalities and injuries Reduce property, cattle, and equipment damage. It contains a list of procedures to follow in the event of such circumstances. It demonstrates how to take preventive measures, get ready for bad situations, minimize them, and maintain positive control in those situations in order to preserve lives and lessen property damage.
Learn more about Emergency preparedness here
https://brainly.com/question/5716389
#SPJ4
Emergency preparedness consists of ______ to reduce the loss of life and property and to protect a nation's institutions from all types of hazards.
The government may take property for public ue if it reaonably believe that taking it will _____. Provide profit for the government
provide profit for the public
benefit the government
benefit the public
If the government has a good faith belief that taking the property will benefit the government, it may seize it for public purposes. A constitutional right recognized by the Fifth Amendment is the right of eminent domain.
Private property is taken through eminent domain condemnation proceedings, where owners may challenge the legality of the takeover and bargain over the just compensation amount.
The most straightforward instances of condemnation include the seizing of property to make place for a public project. In order to construct highways, it may also be necessary to take private property's airspace, water, dirt, lumber, and rock.
As part of the FY 2015 budget, Congress approved a law preventing the Federal Housing Administration from financing mortgages taken by eminent domain.
To learn more about eminent domain, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/28426338
#SPJ4
When “Great Balls of Fire” played on the jukebox at Brother Jimmy’s BBQ, the bartender poured Bacardi rum onto the bar and lit it on fire. The flame blew back into the bottle of rum and the burning contents shot out. A patron was severely burned and sued the restaurant and Bacardi claiming strict liability. Is Bacardi guilty of Strict Liability? Why or Why Not?
Whether Bacardi is guilty of strict liability in this situation depends on the specific laws and regulations in place in the jurisdiction where the incident occurred.
Strict liability is a legal principle that holds a person or company liable for damages caused by their product, regardless of whether they were negligent or not. It is often applied in cases involving dangerous or defective products, such as a bottle of rum that is prone to causing fires.
If the jurisdiction recognizes strict liability in product liability cases, and the rum bottle is found to be defective or dangerous, Bacardi may be held strictly liable for the damages caused by the incident. However, it is also possible that the restaurant or the bartender could be held liable for how the rum was used, if it can be proven that they were negligent in handling the bottle, or if there was a lack of warning or safety measures in place.
It's important to note that each jurisdiction has its own laws, regulations and specific cases, so it would require a review of the facts and the law in question to determine if Bacardi is guilty of strict liability in this situation.
This sign means you are approaching a railroad crossing that does not have a signal. you should: Come to a complete stop.Proceed at a consistent speed while looking and listening for approaching trains.Slow down, look both ways, listen for any trains, and be prepared to stop if any trains are nearby.
If any trains are approaching, you need to slow down, look both ways, listen for them, and be prepared to stop. You must do this if you are crossing a railway without a signal.
When approaching a railroad crossing denoted by this symbol, a person must look both ways, keep an eye out for any approaching trains, and be ready to stop. Never attempt to outrun a coming train. The signal for the train crossing serves as a caution. Oncoming drivers are alerted that there are adjacent railroad lines by signs at railroad crossings. Due to the possibility of trains coming from both ways, drivers must be aware of them and ready to stop if necessary. The lights or traffic control systems at the railroad crossing are examples of active signposts, whereas this sign is passive. Drivers must avoid stopping on train tracks since trains can pass by at any time, day or night, posing a risk of accidents.
Learn more about railroad here
https://brainly.com/question/26083805
#SPJ4
What is revealed in Henry Jekyll's full statement of the case?.
Answer:
Chapter 10 - Henry Jekyll's Full Statement of the Case
Jekyll tells the story of how he turned into Hyde. It began as scientific curiosity in the duality of human nature (or the good and evil), and his attempt to destroy the 'darker self'.
which of the following are examples of local laws in other countries and their associated penalties? (check all that apply.)
Option 1 is Correct. Following are a few examples of regional laws from other nations and the punishments they entail that fall under diplomatic immunity.
As the main court of the United Nations, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) was established in 1946. (UN). One of the four major categories you could run into is common law. The other two are civil law, religious law, and customary law. A hybrid system is used in several nations by combining more than one of these systems at once.
The laws and guidelines that control how states interact with one another, with other states and individuals, and with other international organisations collectively make up international law.
Learn more about penalties Visit: brainly.com/question/28605893
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Which of the following are examples of local laws in other countries and their associated penalties? (check all that apply.):
1. diplomatic immunity
2. prohibition against genocide
3. regulation of antitrust law
4. prohibition against price fixing
for each of the following situations: would a court likely hold ursula liable for copyright infringement? why or why not? if not, is there some other intellectual property rule that may apply? be sure to explain your answer
A copyrighted work is generally considered to have been violated when it is copied, distributed, performed, publicly displayed, or transformed into a derivative work without the owner's consent.
What is copyright infringement?If someone knew about the infringement or had reason to know about it, they may be held accountable as a contributory infringer. Contributory infringers include those who intentionally instigate, cause, or materially contribute to copyright infringement.
If the defendant knew or should have known about the infringement and purposefully [caused] [materially contributed to] that infringement.
Any reproduction, distribution, performance, public exhibition, or creation of a derivative work involving a copyrighted work that is done without the owner's consent constitutes copyright infringement.
Any of these works' copyright holders have the right to sue anyone who violates their intellectual property to stop the violation.
To learn more about copyright infringement refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14855154
#SPJ4
texas real estate license holders may determine whether they are using the correct version of a trec form by
Texas real estate license holders may determine whether they are using the correct version of a trec form by verifying current forms on the TREC websites.
What protections does the Texas Real Estate Licensing Act offer?Texas Real Estate License Act protects the statute provides a code of ethics and a standard of conduct for real estate salespeople and brokers in terms of how they should handle customers and other competitors. It outlines the disciplinary processes, fines, and legal or criminal responsibility.when the customer requests the use of a different form. Transactions for which a contract form has been created by a principal to the transaction are an exemption to the requirement that TREC-promulgated forms be used, according to Section 537.11(a)(3).TREC does not provide forms for commercial property, listing or buyer representation agreements, or contracts for property management.To learn more about TREC refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14279349
#SPJ4
what would be the biggest obstacle to ratifying the new constitution, if they were bound by the amendment rules of the articles of confederation?
the biggest obstacle to ratifying the new constitution, if they were bound by the amendment rules of the articles of confederation: The state legislatures had to agree in unison.
The Constitution was amazing, but it had serious flaws. For starters, it lacked a detailed proclamation or bill of individual rights.It listed the government's powers but omitted the restrictions placed on them. Another reason was that not everyone could use it. Only affluent white men were considered to be the "consent of the governed."
The lack of a "bill of rights" proved to be a barrier to state ratification of the Constitution. The form of the new administration wouldn't be decided for another four years, despite heated discussion. A bill of rights was excluded by the Federalists because they believed it was unnecessary. The Anti-Federalists refused to back the Constitution without one because they feared a powerful centralized government.
To know more about constitution:
https://brainly.com/question/17020039
#SPJ4
true/false.. although the eu can influence the practices of businesses located in non-eu member countries, microsoft has been able to maintain business in the eu much as it conducts business in the united states.
The IMF monitors both the global economy and the economies of its members, loans to those having balance of payments issues, and assists its members directly business.
Prior to joining the World Bank Group, nations must first become members of the IMF; currently, each organization has 189 members. Laws and regulations govern how formal institutions function. They demand that each member sign a written pledge. Local town/city administrations and the American government are two examples of informal, normative institutions business. Because none of the "member countries" of the IMF are sovereign states, none of them are United Nations members. The IMF supports national capacity-building efforts and works to advance global macroeconomic and financial stability by offering policy recommendations. The European Parliament is directly elected by and represents the people of the EU member states. Together with the European Union Council, it makes decisions regarding European laws.
Learn more about business here :
https://brainly.com/question/27882512?
#SPJ4
consider the following passages that seem to describe aspects of the magna carta. more than one of these passages is accurate. however, at least one is not accurate. select all the passages that are true. group of answer choices this document is credited with establishing the principle that the english government, even with its king as its head of state, was subject to the rule of law, which is the essential idea upon which the united states constitution is based. the magna carta is the original source of the bedrock idea in the united states constitution that all people owe a debt of public service in exchange for their freedom; in fact, the united states constitution directly borrowed the privileges and freedoms clause from the famous twelfth paragraph in the magna carta. english king john reluctantly agreed to sign and place his seal on the great charter at runnymeade, england in 1215 in order to essentially make peace between himself and a group of disaffected english noblemen and barons. it was the great survey of much of england, completed in 1086 by order of the english king william i, the document marked a revolutionary step forward in recording public records, which allowed for improved government administration.
In order to essentially make peace with a group of disgruntled English noblemen and barons, English King John grudgingly consented to sign and put his mark on the Great Charter in 1215 at Runnymeade, England.
The fundamental premise on which the United States Constitution is based that the English government, even with its king as its head of state, was subject to the rule of law was established by this text. The United Kingdom includes the nation of England. With Wales to the west and Scotland to the north, it has shared land borders. Northwest and southwest, respectively, are the Irish Sea and the Celtic Sea. The English Channel to the south and the North Sea to the east divide it from mainland Europe. Over 100 smaller islands, including the Isles of Scilly and the Isle of Wight, are part of the country, which takes up five-eighths of the North Atlantic island of Great Britain.
Learn more about England here
https://brainly.com/question/21221749
#SPJ4
which of these is a basis by which a federal court may have jurisdiction to hear a case? g
Which of the following specifies the factual and legal basis for the lawsuit and the relief the plaintiff seeks?a. the answer b. the counterclaim c. the complaint. d. the reply
A complaint specifies the factual and legal basis for the lawsuit and the relief the plaintiff seeks.
The correct option is Option C.
Any civil case starts with pleading only after a complaint is first filed.
A complaint is in essence a document that puts forth the jurisdictional basis for the plaintiff's cause of action and a demand for relief from the judiciary.
A complaint must include a complete list of the plaintiff's allegations against the respondent as well as the specific relief the plaintiff is looking for. The defendant shall file an answer within ten (10) days after receipt of the complaint.
Traditionally, complaints did not have to be highly precise or state the facts the plaintiff intended to establish in accordance with the federal courts' notice pleading system.
Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, a case decided by the Supreme Court in 2007, raised the bar for complaints. A complaint must, according to this ruling, contain "enough facts to make a claim to relief that is believable on its face.
To know more about complaint , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/14620734
#SPJ4
Miranda rights are required when:
a. a suspect is being booked.
b. a suspect is being questioned.
c. a suspect is being arrested.
d. a suspect is in custody and being questioned.
Answer:
d. a suspect is in custody and being questioned.
courts have defined interstate commerce (which the u.s. congress has the power to regulate) as the sale or exchange of goods, services, or information between...
On February 4, 1887, the Senate and the House passed the Interstate Commerce Act, which applied the "Commerce Clause" of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the many States," to controlling railroad rates.
The Commerce Clause outlines a power that is enumerated in the US Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). According to the provision, the US Congress has the authority "to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the various States, and with the Indian Tribes." Each of these three areas of trade has typically been discussed by courts and observers as a distinct congressional power. It is typical to hear the terms "Foreign Commerce Clause," "Interstate Commerce Clause," and "Indian Commerce Clause" used to refer to the various parts of the Commerce Clause. Regarding the scope of the powers granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause, there is litigation in the courts. In order to view these abilities more broadly and expansively, it is sometimes combined with the Necessary and Proper Clause, as is mentioned below.
Learn more about Commerce Clause here
https://brainly.com/question/846709
#SPJ4
procedural due process is a doctrine of the supreme court that negated numerous laws in the first third of the 20th century. its use in the past 80 years is greatly diminished, but it survives in terms of protecting substantive liberties not otherwise enumerated in the constitution.
Substantive due process was used in the past 80 years is greatly diminished, but it survives in terms of protecting substantive liberties not otherwise enumerated in the constitution.
The takings clause, substantive due process, and procedural due process are the three main components of the Fifth Amendment. The amendment forbids the government from unilaterally threatening the life of a suspected criminal in terms of due process. Fairness in the courtroom is also required by the constitution in civil actions. The court's review of substantive due process concerns is two-tiered. Legislation pertaining to economic issues, labor rights, and other business issues is only lightly regulated by the courts in the first tier. This implies that a law can only be overturned if it accomplishes no legitimate governmental goal. Legislation pertaining to basic rights is subject to "heightened judicial examination" under the upper tier, which means that it won't pass unless it's "narrowly tailored to suit a meaningful government objective."
Learn more about substantive here
https://brainly.com/question/29392513
#SPJ4
In regards to a life insurance contract, which of the following statements is NOT true regarding the concept of insurable interest?Individuals are assumed to have insurable interest in themselvesInsurable interest is established by a court of lawInsurable interest can be established sufficiently by sentimental attachment aloneInsurable interest must exist at the time of the application
Insurable interest can be established sufficiently by sentimental attachment alone is NOT TRUE In regards to a life insurance contract, true regarding the concept of insurable interest.
the attachment that a person has to anything, such as a piece of property or another person, such that they would lose out if the property or person were damaged. Only things or people in that you hold an insurable interest may be insured, according to insurance law. Any investment that is vulnerable to financial loss is protected by insurable interest. When the loss or damage of the object will result in a financial loss or other troubles, that individual or corporation has an insurable interest in that thing, event, or action. A individual or organization would purchase an insurance policy to cover the specific person, thing, or event in order to safeguard an insurable interest.
To know more about Insurable interest:
https://brainly.com/question/28938508
#SPJ4
A broker-dealer is registering a security in a State by coordination. In doing so, the broker-dealer files the necessary paperwork with the SEC and is compliant with the:
A. Securities Act of 1933
B. Investment Advisers Act of 1940
C. Investment Company Act of 1940
D. ERISA of 1974
A
The correct response is A. Securities Act of 1933. A broker-dealer registers a security in a State. In doing so, the broker-dealer complies with the following requirements and submits the required paperwork with the SEC: Securities Act of 1933.
The US Congress passed the Securities Act of 1933 on May 27, 1933, during the height of the Great Depression and in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash. It is also referred to as the Securities Act, the Truth in Securities Act, the Federal Securities Act, and the '33 Act. It is an essential component of American securities regulation. The Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause serves as the basis for this legislation. Unless there is a legal exemption, the 1933 Act mandates that every offer and sale of securities that utilizes the channels and tools of interstate commerce be registered with the SEC. By attempting to offer or sell a security without employing a "instrumentality" of interstate commerce, it is practically difficult to evade the application of the legislation since the term "means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce" is so broad. To make the transaction subject to the Act, it would likely only take the use of a telephone or the mail.
Learn more about Securities Act of 1933 here
https://brainly.com/question/17162129
#SPJ4
A form of governemtn that is often totalitarian and authoritarian; can be led by one person or many people.
A form of government that can be run by one person or a group of individuals and is frequently totalitarian and authoritarian: Dictatorship
A leader, or group of leaders, who maintain significant political authority with little or no checks and balances, constitutes a dictatorship. A dictatorship's leader is a dictator. In a dictatorship, the ruler controls politics with the help of an inner circle of powerful individuals, which includes advisers, generals, and other senior officials. While suppressing any opposition, which could consist of competing political parties, armed resistance, or disloyal inner-circle members, the dictator maintains authority through swaying and appeasing the inner circle. A military takeover that forcibly topples the previous administration or a self-coup by elected officials that establishes their authority as law might result in a dictatorship. Totalitarian or authoritarian dictatorships can be exemplified by military, one-party, personalist, or absolute monarchies.
Learn more about Dictatorship here
https://brainly.com/question/3710030
#SPJ4
difference between direct and circumstantial evidence?
which of the following scenarios best illustrates the concept of concurrent powers? responses the president negotiates a treaty regarding climate change with foreign governments, but for the treaty to take effect, it requires approval by the senate. the president negotiates a treaty regarding climate change with foreign governments, but for the treaty to take effect, it requires approval by the senate. as commander-in-chief of the military, the president orders troops to a foreign nation to address a potential threat to national security. as commander-in-chief of the military, the president orders troops to a foreign nation to address a potential threat to national security. a senate committee holds a hearing to discuss potential misuse of funds by the department of veterans affairs. a senate committee holds a hearing to discuss potential misuse of funds by the department of veterans affairs. the federal government provides about 25% of the total funding for highways and transit in the united states, while the other 75% of the funding comes from states.
About 25% of the nation's total financing for roadways and transit comes from the federal government, with the remaining 75% coming from the states.
In the United States, financing for transportation is provided by both the federal and state governments, demonstrating concurrent authority. Powers that are shared by the federal and state governments are known as concurrent powers. Congress, the President, and the Federal courts in that order have authority over the three separate branches of the federal government: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Australia, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the United States are a few examples. Federal denotes the coexistence of a federal and state government. In a "republic," decisions are made by the people, who also choose representatives to carry them out. Among other things, these enumerated powers include the ability to levy taxes, control commerce, establish a uniform naturalization law, create federal courts (subordinate to the Supreme Court), create and maintain a military, and declare war.
Learn more about federal government here
https://brainly.com/question/12486518
#SPJ4
WHEN CAN failure of election be declared?.
Answer:When “Great Balls of Fire” played on the jukebox at Brother Jimmy’s BBQ, the bartender poured Bacardi rum onto the bar and lit it on fire. The flame blew back into the bottle of rum and the burning contents shot out. A patron was severely burned and sued the restaurant and Bacardi claiming strict liability. Is Bacardi guilty of Strict Liability? Why or Why Not?
Explanation: pls i need help
the foundation for a constitutional monarchy in england began with the
The foundation for a constitutional monarchy in England began with the Toleration Act of 1489.
The Toleration Act of 1489 laid the groundwork for a constitutional monarchy in England. The Bill of Rights Wonderful Revolution. The Nantes Decree. In order to secure religious freedom for its people, France engaged in combat with both the Holy Roman Empire and Spain during the Thirty Years' War. keep alive the kings' divine right. The Anglo-Saxon invasion of England signalled the beginning of the true monarchy in Britain. A new system of government known as the Heptarchy was instituted across the nation once they had started the takeover of Britain. Under the Heptarchy, England was divided into seven principal kingdoms.
To know more about engaged refer :
brainly.com/question/21928572
#SPJ4
crime fraud exception to attorney client privilege
The attorney-client privilege is a legal principle that protects communications between a client and their attorney from being revealed in court.
What is crime fraud ?
The crime-fraud exception is an exception to the attorney-client privilege that allows for the disclosure of otherwise privileged communications if the communication is made in furtherance of a crime or fraud.
This exception applies when the client has sought the attorney's assistance in committing a crime or fraud.
For the crime-fraud exception to apply, the government must have a reasonable belief that a crime or fraud has occurred, and that the attorney-client communication is relevant to that crime or fraud.
In such cases, the attorney may be compelled to reveal the communication to the court or the government.
It is important to note that the crime-fraud exception applies only to communications made after the crime or fraud has been committed.
In summary, the Crime-Fraud exception is an exception to the attorney-client privilege. It applies when the client has sought the attorney's assistance in committing a crime or fraud.
If a crime or fraud has occurred and the attorney-client communication is relevant to that crime or fraud, the attorney may be compelled to reveal the communication to the court or the government.
To learn more about Government refer:
https://brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ4
Two homeowners who own adjacent lots decided to construct a driveway that straddles their common property line. They entered into a written agreement whereby each granted to the other a right of access over his property in accord with the dimensions and location of the driveway and each promised that he, his heirs, devisees, assignees and successors would equally share the repair and maintenance of the driveway, including the cost of snow removal, with the neighboring property owner. This agreement was promptly and properly recorded. After the driveway was built, the owner of one of the improved lots sold it in fee simple absolute to a buyer who currently lives on the premises. A year ago, the owner of the other lot died. His property passed by intestacy to his son. Through an oral agreement, the son, who has a residence elsewhere, has rented out the inherited residence to a tenant for a one-year term. The son told the tenant of the shared maintenance agreement with the neighbor, but otherwise did not discuss the maintenance of the driveway with the tenant. This past winter, due to a number of heavy snowfalls, the removal of the snow in order to be able to use the driveway was costly. When the tenant contacted the current owner of the neighboring property, the owner, noting that he rarely used the driveway due to his advanced age and poor health, refused to reimburse the tenant for the snow removal costs borne by the tenant.If the tenant seeks to recover half of the costs for snow removal from the current neighbor, who will prevail?A. The tenant, because the tenant acted in reliance to his detriment on the son's revelation of the agreement.B. The tenant, because the agreement contains a covenant that runs with land.C. The neighbor, because only the son can enforce the agreement.D. The neighbor, because there was no horizontal privity between the neighbors who entered into the agreement.
The tenant, because the agreement contains a covenant that runs with land.
What is an agreement?A contract is a written agreement between two or more parties that outlines specific, legally binding rights and duties for each party. In most cases, a contract entails the transfer of products, services, money, or a promise to transfer any of those at a later time.An agreement is a sign of two or more people's consent to one another. It occurs through an offer and an acceptance and represents a coming together of the minds with a shared goal. Words, behaviour, and in certain circumstances even silence may all be used to demonstrate an agreement.To learn more about agreement refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15193799
#SPJ4
letting the sun in 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 the most basic way for citizens to hold leaders responsible is by voting in elections and by serving on juries in open courtroom proceedings. but these are not the only ways. in the united states and in other democracies, citizens can influence government on a daily basis, not just on election day. numerous other opportunities can, and should, exist to ensure that both elected and non-elected public officials remain accountable to the people. in the united states, when executive branch officials get together to conduct government business, they are often required to announce their meetings in advance and to hold them in forums that are open to the public. the law underlying this practice, a federal statute dubbed the
The law underlying the above practice, a federal statute dubbed the sunshine laws or open meeting laws. With a few significant exceptions, most sessions of federal and state agencies and regulatory organizations must be open to the public in accordance with open meeting rules, commonly known as sunshine laws.
Although the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 and laws governing open meetings are closely related, neither the First Amendment nor any national minimum standards define "openness." The question of whether certain exceptions warrant closing particular meetings of governmental organizations has dominated a significant portion of litigation about open meeting laws. Laws requiring open meetings are a recent phenomenon. They protect the public's right to have access to all aspects of government operations. This "right" cannot be linked to the shared common law system between America and England.
To know more about sunshine laws:
https://brainly.com/question/1238944
#SPJ4
liability for illegal alcohol sales can be any of the following except
Except for Private, any of the following may be held accountable for illicit alcohol sales. In civil cases, bars, restaurants, and other businesses with licenses to sell and/or serve alcoholic beverages may be held accountable for doing so unlawfully.
Due to the fact that individuals under the age of 21 are not permitted to consume alcohol, dram shop rules also cover injuries caused by minors who were provided alcohol by authorized facilities (with only minimal exceptions in some states, often for religious purposes).
A close relative who was financially reliant on the deceased or the executor of their estate would be given the authority to launch a civil case in the majority of states in the event that an innocent individual passed away.
To learn more about illegal alcohol sales, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29596163
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Liability for illegal alcohol sales can be any of the following EXCEPT:
Civil
Private
Criminal
Administrative
which of the following protects a policy owner from a misrepresentation caused by an innocent mistake
Incontestable clause protects a policy owner from a misrepresentation caused by an innocent mistake.
An incontestability clause is a clause used in a disability or life insurance policy. It effectively prevents the insurance company from striking down any policy on the basis of any misstatements in the policy application once the insurance is in place or for term of two years.
Almost every state mandates the presence of such a provision in the insurance policies.
Incontestability clauses shield insured parties from companies that might try to withhold benefits in the case of a claim. Although the insured is helped by this clause, it cannot shield them from outright deception.
One of the strongest safeguards for a policyholder or beneficiary is the incontestability clause found in life insurance plans. This law is clearly and forcefully on the side of the consumer, in contrast to many other legal insurance regulations that benefit insurance corporations.
To know more about Incontestable clause, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30028062
#SPJ4
A tenant's right to withhold rent as an action taken under constructive eviction will generally be upheld by Georgia courts only if the
A)
tenant has moved out and shown that the property is unfit for habitability.
B)
landlord does not allow the tenant who made repairs to deduct that cost from the rent.
C)
tenant can document how the conditions in the property occupied violates their quiet enjoyment.
D)
tenant has taken on the costs of repairing the damage to the occupied property.
A tenant's right to withhold rent as an action taken under constructive eviction will generally be upheld by Georgia courts only if the- A) tenant has moved out and shown that the property is unfit for habitability.
Tenants have the legal right to adequate housing, which means that they must be capable of living in a rental unit in good circumstances, in accordance with Georgia landlord-tenant legislation and the Federal Fair Housing Act. On the contrary hand, every tenant in Georgia is entitled to fair and equal treatment from his landlord under the law. Learn more about the Federal Fair Housing Act in Georgia. If the damage goes beyond ordinary wear and tear, they may also request repairs under their tenant rights. The renter may seek legal counsel and damages if the landlord doesn't make these repairs within a reasonable period of time.
To know more about tenants rights:
https://brainly.com/question/14998321
#SPJ4
what is the function of government in a free enterprise system?
Laws are enacted by the government through the free enterprise system to help safeguard citizens from deceptive advertising, dangerous food and medications, environmental dangers, and unsafe goods.
A common conception of free enterprise system or capitalism is as an economic structure where different actors own and manage property according to their interests and where supply and demand freely determine market prices in a manner that can best serve society. The desire to turn a profit is capitalism's fundamental characteristic. According to Adam Smith, "We expect our dinner not from the goodness of the butchers, the brewers, or the baker, but from their respect to their own profit." In a voluntary exchange transaction, each party has a stake in the outcome, but neither can get what they want without considering the other party's desires. This logical self-interest is what can result in success for the economy. A capitalist economy allows for the private ownership and control of capital assets like mines, factories, and railroads as well as the purchase of labor for monetary salaries, the accrual of capital profits to private individuals, and the allocation of labour and capital between competing uses by prices.
Learn more about free enterprise here
https://brainly.com/question/13385599
#SPJ4
