The double jeopardy clause, as outlined in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, prohibits an individual from being tried for the same crime twice. This principle is intended to protect citizens from being subjected to the trauma and financial burden of multiple trials for the same offense. However, there is ongoing debate about whether prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts should also be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause.
One argument for prohibiting prosecution in both state and federal courts is that it would prevent the government from using the legal system as a means of harassment or punishment. If an individual is acquitted or convicted in a state court, it would be unjust for them to be subjected to another trial in a federal court for the same crime. This would also prevent the government from using multiple trials as a means of securing a conviction, even if there is not enough evidence to support a guilty verdict in one court.
On the other hand, some argue that prosecution in both state and federal courts should not be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause because it allows for different levels of government to hold individuals accountable for their actions. For example, if a crime is committed on federal land or involves crossing state lines, it may be appropriate for both state and federal prosecutors to pursue charges. Additionally, some argue that prohibiting prosecution in both state and federal courts would hinder the government's ability to effectively combat organized crime or other complex criminal activities that may span multiple jurisdictions.
In conclusion, the double jeopardy clause is an important principle that is intended to protect citizens from being subjected to multiple trials for the same crime. However, whether prosecution in both state and federal courts should be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential consequences for citizens and the government's ability to effectively combat crime.
under the federal rules, when offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, a testifying witness's prior inconsistent statement made at a deposition is: responsespress enter or space to submit the answer
responsespress enter or space to submit the answer the witness is subject to cross-examination.
Presented as evidence for the claim's veracity - People frequently trip over this section. The claim must be made in support of the veracity of whatever the speaker was asserting. It is not hearsay if the comment is not presented as proof that what was said is accurate. A past statement that the declarant makes during testimony that is the subject of cross-examination is in conflict with the declarant's testimony and was made under oath during a trial, hearing, other proceeding, or in a deposition. Witness's Earlier Remarks Rule 613. Witness's Earlier Remarks During the Examination, Displaying or Disclosing the Statement A party is not required to provide or reveal a witness' prior statement during cross-examination regarding that statement.
To know more about section refer :
brainly.com/question/30004401
#SPJ4
identify four church policies that caused public dissatisfaction and inspired wycliffe, huss, and luther to demand reform.
1. The Catholic church's corruption, 2. Champions of justice such as Wycliffe, Huss, and Luther, 3. Unam Sanctum, 4. Native language translations of the Bible from Latin.
As of 2019, there were 1.3 billion baptized Catholics worldwide, making the Catholic Church, also known as the Roman Catholic Church, the biggest Christian denomination. It is one of the biggest and oldest international organizations in the world, and it has had a significant impact on the evolution of Western civilisation. The church is made up of 24 sui iuris churches, which include the Latin Church and 23 Eastern Catholic Churches. Together, they make up about 3,500 dioceses and eparchies around the globe. The head of the church is the pope, who serves as the diocese of Rome. The chief body in charge of governing the church is the bishopric of Rome, also known as the Holy See. Vatican City, a small enclave of Rome, the capital city of Italy, and where the pope serves as head of state, is home to the Roman Curia, the body responsible for overseeing the Holy See.
Learn more about Catholic church here
https://brainly.com/question/1261467
#SPJ4
Answer: 1. The Catholic church's corruption, 2. Champions of justice such as Wycliffe, Huss, and Luther, 3. Unam Sanctum, 4. Native language translations of the Bible from Latin.
Explanation:
if you have an accident, the law requires you to exchange your drivers license information with: firefighters security guards others involved in the accident submit answer
if you have an accident, the law requires you to exchange your drivers license information with Security guards
How to avoid accident?Around the world, the 4 E's—education, enforcement, engineering, environment, and emergency care for victims of traffic accidents—have been the main focus of accident prevention and control. Drive according to the posted speed restrictions on the different roads. Keep in mind that "speed thrills but kills."Before operating a bicycle, motorcycle, or car, always wear seat belts, helmets, and other safety gear. Overspeeding, reckless driving, breaking the law, misreading traffic signs, being tired, and drinking are all examples of driver error. Pedestrian: Ignorance, erroneous crossings, traveling on the carriageway, and jaywalkers.The law mandates that you give security personnel information from your driver's license in the event of an accident.
To learn more about avoid accident refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24622288
#SPJ4
system in which government owns and controls some factors of production
Command economies is the system in which government owns and controls some factors of production.
three economic problems of "what to create," "how to produce it," and "for whom to produce it" are all addressed by the government in command economies. Command economies are frequently linked to authoritarianism, socialism, and communism.
A command economy is one in which the production and distribution of products and services are centrally planned and managed by the government. Typically, this sort of economy is linked to socialist or communist political ideologies. All economic choices are made by the government, and there is little to no private property ownership.
To know more about command economy click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13719381#
#SPJ4
true/false. statement of timothy j. mayopoulos, before the united states house of representatives committee on oversight and government reform and subcommittee on domestic policy, part iv, nov. 17, 2009
True. statement of timothy j. mayopoulos, before the united states house of representatives committee on oversight and government reform and subcommittee on domestic policy, part iv, Nov. 17, 2009.
Tim has a lengthy background in the financial industry. Tim is a member of the governing boards of SAIC, a software processor for the civilian, defense, and national security departments of the U.S. government, and LendingClub, the top digital marketplaces bank in the country. Tim works with several private businesses as a chairman or advisor. Questions have been raised regarding the legal counsel the company got over whether or not to disclose to shareholders the size of the prospective year-end bonus in the light of the Securities and Exchange Commission's ongoing lawsuit against Bank of America. Employee pool for Merrill Lynch. I don't believe I was involved in this matter in any way. Neither the disclosure schedule nor the merger agreement's clauses pertaining to the Merrill Lynch workers' bonus pool were negotiated or written by me. It was handled by other people. Regarding transparency, I did not participate in the creation of the proxy statement that was delivered to shareholders to request their consent to the transaction.
Learn more about shareholders here
https://brainly.com/question/29803660
#SPJ4
The first goal (objective) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, also called Superfund), is to:- replace Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act when dealing with hazardous waste.- discover those responsible for the contamination and seek payment for the cleanup.- provide financial assistance to companies attempting to clean up hazardous waste sites.- identify sites where contamination of air, soil, and water by hazardous substances has been sufficient to threaten human health or harm the environment.- reduce threats to human health and the environment, usually by cleaning the site.
The federal government has considerable authority under CERCLA to control hazardous substances, respond to releases, and come up with long-term fixes for the most significant problems facing the country.
What does the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation?The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, also known as CERCLA or Superfund, establishes a Federal "Superfund" to clean up unmanaged or abandoned hazardous-waste sites as well as accidents, spills, and other urgent environmental pollution releases.To pay for the costs of clearing up environmentally dangerous regions, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) was established.The Central Government shall have the authority to adopt any and all measures it deems appropriate or necessary for the prevention, control, and mitigation of environmental contamination. This authority shall be subject to the terms of this Act. The President may take action in response to discharges or threatened releases of hazardous materials under Superfund.To learn more about hazardous refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30088463
#SPJ4
the security guard is given authority to arrest by:* new york state lawmon law.employers policies and procedures.all of the above.T/F
In New York state, security guards do not have the legal authority to make arrests. Only law enforcement officers, such as police officers, have the authority to make arrests.so the statement is false.
What is law enforcement?Common law, which is a body of legal principles that are based on judicial decisions and not statutory laws, does not grant security guards the authority to make arrests.Employers may grant security guards the authority to make arrests through their policies and procedures, but such authority would be limited to the specific property or area for which the security guard is responsible.It is important to note that private citizens, including security guards, can make a citizen's arrest under certain circumstances. However, the circumstances under which a citizen's arrest can be made are limited, and the individual making the arrest must have probable cause to believe that the person being arrested has committed a crime.In summary, the security guard is not given authority to arrest by New York State Law or Common Law. Employers may give them the authority to arrest under specific circumstances but it is limited to their property or area they are responsible for.To learn more about law enforcement refer:
brainly.com/question/21082629
#SPJ4
Why were many state legislators initially hesitant to create a state police force?
Responses
They believed that it was the responsibility of the federal government to patrol highways.
They did not think the state could afford to pay the salaries of state police officers.
They did not want to have to worry about receiving traffic tickets as they traveled to and from the capital.
Several states had created state police forces that did not represent the people of the state but carried out the wishes of wealthy industrialists.
Answer: All of the given responses are reasons why many state legislators were initially hesitant to create a state police force.
They believed that it was the responsibility of the federal government to patrol highways.
They did not think the state could afford to pay the salaries of state police officers.
They did not want to have to worry about receiving traffic tickets as they traveled to and from the capital.
Several states had created state police forces that did not represent the people of the state but carried out the wishes of wealthy industrialists.
Additionally, some legislators may also have concerns about the potential for abuse of power by a state police force or the potential for the state police to be used as a tool of political oppression by those in power.
sandra enters into a contract to sell her home to paul. under the statute of frauds, in order to be legally enforceable, the written contract must name the contracting parties, identify the subject matter of the contract, and .
Paul and Sandra sign a deal for Sandra to sell her house. Under the statute of frauds, the written contract must name the contracting parties, identify the subject matter of the contract, and Present the essential terms and conditions of the contract.
Sandra Ann Lauer (born 18 May 1962), also known by her stage names Sandra and Sandra Cretu, is a Franco-German pop singer who achieved mainstream success in the 1980s and early 1990s with a number of European hit singles produced by her ex-husband and musical collaborator, Michael Cretu. These songs include "(I'll Never Be) Maria Magdalena" (1985), "In the Heat of the Night" (1985), "Everlasting Love" (1987), "Secret Land (1992). Sandra has received excellent praise from critics for her albums Into a Secret Land (1988) and Close to Seven (1992). Before starting a solo career, Sandra was the lead vocalist of the all-female disco group Arabesque, which enjoyed tremendous success in the Soviet Union and Japan. She also contributed vocals to the albums that were released between 1990 and 2001 by the hugely popular musical project Enigma, which had top 10 songs in the UK and North America. Sandra, a cult celebrity with a devoted following, is still regarded as one of the most well-liked singers from the 1980s in Continental Europe. She even outsold Madonna at one point in time in a few different nations during the height of her fame. Sandra has cemented her status as the most successful German female vocalist with global record sales of more than 33 million.
Learn more about Sandra here
https://brainly.com/question/16664598
#SPJ4
country z is both a producer and an importer of cloth. which of the following will happen if the government of country z imposes a tariff on cloth and the country continues to import some cloth from abroad?
There will be a decrease in domestic producer surplus. The amount of cloth that is required will rise.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price a person would accept for a certain quantity of a good and the price they could get for the good if they sold it at market value. The producer benefits from market sales of the good by receiving the difference or surplus amount.Market pricing above the lowest price producers would normally be ready to pay for their goods result in a producer surplus. The Walras law may be relevant here. Overall economic surplus, which is the advantage brought about by producers and consumers interacting in a free market as opposed to one with price controls or quotas, is the sum of a producer surplus and a consumer surplus.
To know more about law refer :
brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ4
A provider who violates the Civil False Claims Act may have to pay a Civil Mentary Penalty (CMP) of $20,000 for each false claim.
A. True
B. False
A provider who violates the Civil False Claims Act may have to pay a Civil Mentary Penalty (CMP) of $20,000 for each false claim. is false.
What constitutes resource misuse, such as?Any resource misuse, including the excessive use of services or other methods that directly or indirectly add needless expenses to the Medicare Program, is considered waste.Once a corrective action plan has been implemented, it is necessary to review the corrective measures on a yearly basis to make sure they are working. Anyone who willfully files fraudulent claims to the government is accountable for five times the losses the offender caused the government, in addition to a fine.Act Against False Claims [31 U.S.C.,It is against the law to submit Medicare or Medicaid payment claims that you know to be false or fraudulent. False claim filing is punishable by fines of up to three times the program's loss plus $11,000 for each claim.To learn more about Civil False Claims Act refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24322083
#SPJ4
The distracted driver of a powerboat struck and seriously injured two water skiers who, at time of the accident, were performing a stunt in which one was on the shoulders of the other. The unrelated skiers, who each suffered damages in excess of $100,000, filed a joint complaint based on negligence in a federal court located in the district in which the accident occurred. One of the skiers was a citizen of the forum state. The driver-defendant and the other skier were citizens of a neighboring state. The forum state has a long-arm statute that permits the exercise of jurisdiction to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Upon which of the following grounds can the driver most likely successfully move for dismissal of the claim asserted by the skier who is not a citizen of the forum state?
A Improper joinder
B Lack of subject matter jurisdiction
C Lack of personal jurisdiction
D Lack of venue
The correct response is B. Lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The federal district court lacks both diversity and additional jurisdiction over the non-forum skier's claim.
This claim meets the $75,000 threshold for amount in issue, but it does not meet the diversity of citizenship standard because both the defendant and the non-forum skier are residents of the same state. The court does not have diversity jurisdiction over this issue as a result. Even though this claim is based on the same set of relevant facts as the forum-claim, skier's the court is unable to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over it because it does not meet the diversity-of-citizenship criterion. A legal entity's legal authority to administer justice is referred to in law as its jurisdiction. In federations like the United States, there are local, state, and federal levels of jurisdiction. The executive and legislative branches of government have the authority to apply international law, conflict of laws, and other relevant legal theories to allocate resources in the most effective way to suit the needs of society. constitutional law, and other legal frameworks. international scope. In general, international laws and treaties offer commitments that states consent to be obligated to uphold. Such agreements are not usually created or kept up to date. The UN charter outlines three principles for exercising extraterritorial jurisdiction. These three principles are territorial sovereignty, state equality, and non-intervention. This calls into question when many states can establish or enforce jurisdiction.
Learn more about jurisdiction here
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
which of the following are actions practiced by individuals who engage in civic life and public experience?
Answer:
Active communications with representatives and policymakers advocating for one and others' self-interests holding public officials accountable for their actions and decisions accumulation of knowledge about public issues.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
FILL IN THE BLANK there are driver education courses that can get you a ____________. brand new car discount on auto insurance ticket to an amusement park master's degree submit answer
The correct response is b. There are Driver Education courses that can get you a Discount on auto insurance.
In order to protect oneself against financial loss, one party will agree to pay compensation to another in the case of a certain loss, damage, or injury in exchange for a fee. It is a risk management technique that is typically used to guard against the danger of a hypothetical loss that may or may not materialize. Underwriters, insurers, insurance businesses, or carriers are all terms for companies that provide insurance. A person or organization that obtains insurance is known as a policyholder, whereas a person or organization that the policy protects is known as an insured. In a transaction involving insurance, the policyholder consents to pay the insurer (a premium) in exchange for the insurer's promise to provide restitution to the insured in the event of a covered loss by accepting a predictable, manageable, and ensured loss. The loss could be pecuniary or not, but it needs to be quantifiable in terms of money. It also frequently involves property where the insured has an insurable interest based on ownership, possession, or a previous connection.
Learn more about insurance here
https://brainly.com/question/26285319
#SPJ4
Which of the following forms of tenancy involves the possession of property without right?
A)tenancy at sufferance
B)periodic tenancy
C)tenancy for years
D)tenancy at will
the presumption of innocence have any real effect in criminal cases? if not
The presumption of innocence does not often deal with the removal of the burden of evidence, unlike other presumptions. There isn't actually a burden removed from the defendant. The burden of proof does not shift to the prosecution as a result of the presumption of innocence.
What is the Presumption of Innocence and its Role in the Criminal Process?The concept of "presumption of innocence" is one that is proclaimed in numerous international treaties, and legal systems all over the world have come to understand the significance and crucial role that this presumption plays. However, there is little consensus on its significance and range of applicability. This article examines the broad goals of legal presumptions as well as numerous, occasionally incompatible, interpretations of the most well-known one. Many academics compare it to the need for the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, it has no applicability before to or following a trial and is only an evidentiary rule (although an important one). The essay urges the adoption of a more comprehensive, normative strategy.
To learn more about innocence visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22878354
#SPJ1
What purpose does it serve if we punish individuals who break the law?
Answer:
They learn from their mistakes and depending on how severe the punishment is, this prevents other people from breaking the law which will essentially make the world a safer place to live in, without people being constantly in fear that something could happen to them.
Explanation:
Punishing individuals who break the law serves several purposes, including:
Deterrence: Punishment serves as a deterrent to others who may be considering breaking the law. The fear of punishment can discourage people from committing crimes.
Rehabilitation: Punishment can also serve as a means of rehabilitating offenders, helping them to understand the impact of their actions and encouraging them to change their behavior.
Retribution: Punishment can also be seen as a way of holding offenders accountable for their actions and providing a sense of justice for victims and society as a whole.
Protection: Punishment can also serve to protect society by removing dangerous offenders from the community, either through imprisonment or other forms of punishment.
Public safety: Punishing individuals who break the law can also help maintain public safety by removing individuals who pose a threat to society.
Restitution: Punishment can also include restitution, which would be a form of compensation to the victims of the crime.
It is important to note that punishment should be proportionate to the crime committed and should aim to achieve a balance between punishment, rehabilitation, and reintegration of the offender into society.
What institution is created by a society to create and enforce public policies?
Government institution is created by a society to create and enforce public policies.
The people hold the utmost power in government, but the Creator is ultimately responsible for its legitimacy. Government officials will rule with humility and restraint if they recognise and pay attention to the source of their power and authority. Federalism is a form of governance in which a central governing body and its corporation political subdivisions share sovereignty in accordance with the constitution. It is founded on democratic principles and institutions, where national and state governments share executive authority to form a federation. The state of human society has changed from one of savagery to one of civilization. In the process of social evolution, he distinguished several stages, the primitive, the militant, and the industrial.
To know more about corporation refer :
brainly.com/question/21928572
#SPJ4
Brian is formally collecting information for a case to ensure both sides have time to review and obtain answering evidence, it called?
Collecting information for a case to ensure both sides have time to review and obtain answering evidence is called Discovery.
What is Brian doing ?and why?Brian is in the process of collecting information and evidence for a case before it goes to trial.This process is known as discovery, which allows both sides to review and obtain evidence that will be used in the case.During discovery, Brian may request documents, witness statements, or other forms of evidence from the opposing side.This process is important to ensure that both sides have a fair and equal opportunity to present their case in court.Discovery also allows both sides to identify any potential weaknesses in their case and address them before trial.It also helps to narrow down the issues in dispute and to identify potential areas of agreement.Discovery is a key step in the legal process and is designed to ensure that both sides have all the information they need to make informed decisions about their case.
To learn more about discovery refer:
brainly.com/question/28178921
#SPJ4
under the kansas-nebraska act what area decided to use popular sovereihnty to decide the slavery issue?
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed slavery to be legalized in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska (shown in orange).
The territories of Kansas and Nebraska were established by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 (10 Stat. 277). Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas wrote it, the 33rd Congress of the United States approved it, and President Franklin Pierce signed it into law. The Kansas-Nebraska Act is most notable for effectively repealing the Missouri Compromise, stoking national tensions over slavery, and fueling a series of armed conflicts known as "Bleeding Kansas." Douglas originally introduced the bill with the intention of opening up new lands to develop and facilitate the construction of a transcontinental railroad. In the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, the United States gained huge tracts of land. Since the 1840s, Douglas had aimed to create a territorial government in a region of the Louisiana Purchase that was still unorganized. Senator David Rice Atchison and other Southern officials blocked Douglas's attempts by refusing to authorize the establishment of territories that prohibited slavery. Slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise in the region north of latitude 36°30' north, hence Douglas's ambitions were thwarted (except for Missouri).
Learn more about Kansas-Nebraska Act here
https://brainly.com/question/3359357
#SPJ4
law intended to assimilate native americans into american culture
Native Americans had to sign up with the Office of Indian Affairs, now known as the Bureau of Indian Affairs, in order to get their allotment.
Native Americans had to sign up with the Office of Indian Affairs, now known as the Bureau of Indian Affairs, in order to get their allotment. By enrolling, the person gave the office their identity and had their name placed on the "Dawes rolls," which let government organisations determine whether or not that person was qualified to get their allocation. Before the Dawes Act, Native Americans were in possession of about 150 million acres of land, but most of it was lost as a result of allotment partitions and surplus land sales. Tribes were undervalued when they received compensation for their land. Native Americans received limited compensation, were used to spending money, and used the majority of what they did receive rapidly.
To know more about Bureau refer :
brainly.com/question/28041514
#SPJ4
What form is used to request a background investigation?
-SF 702
-SF 86
-Sf 312
-SF 700
SF86
SF86 is a form used to request a background investigation of a person who needs national security.
It collects information and analyzes the risk of the eligibility of access classified national security, and in a position to acquire the protection of a nation as a whole.
There are different types of background checkups. The term security clearance can be used when a person is most useful to a nation and his protection is concerned with the protection of the nation.
Then, the top secret is some types of security checkups. Some examples of investigations are ANACI, BI, MBI, NACLC, etc.
Depending on the investigation levels of the need for security these measures can take place.
To know more about background investigation
brainly.com/question/30244932
#SPJ4
who comprised the prosecution team in the caylee anthony case
Answer:
The lead prosecutor in the case was Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick. Assistant State Attorneys Frank George and Jeff Ashton completed the prosecution team. Lead counsel for the defense was Jose Baez, a Florida criminal defense attorney.
Explanation:
Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick was in charge of the prosecution in this case. The prosecution team was completed by Assistant State Attorneys Frank George and Jeff Ashton.
Jose Baez, a criminal defense lawyer from Florida, served as the defense's principal counsel. Co-counsel included J. Cheney Mason, Dorothy Clay Sims, and Ann Finnell. Mark Lippman, an attorney, represented George and Cindy during the trial.
Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick was in charge of the prosecution in this case. The prosecution team was completed by Assistant State Attorneys Frank George and Jeff Ashton. Jose Baez, a criminal defense lawyer from Florida, served as the defense's principal counsel. Co-counsel included J. Cheney Mason, Dorothy Clay Sims, and Ann Finnell. Mark Lippman, an attorney, represented George and Cindy during the trial.
Learn more about George, here;
https://brainly.com/question/28828204
#SPJ6
which of the following states that government action need only have a reasonable relation to the achievement of a legitimate government purpose to be constitutional? multiple choice intermediate scrutiny due process of law full scrutiny rational basis test
Rational basis test states that government action need only have a reasonable relation to the achievement of a legitimate government purpose to be constitutional.
The rational basis test is type of test used in the process of judicial review. When the court is conducting a judicial review, it is essentially determining the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance.
The term "rational review" is another name for the rational basic test.
The statute or ordinance must have a valid state interest and a rational connection between its means and aims in order to pass the rational basis test.
The rational basis test, the intermediate scrutiny test, and the stringent scrutiny test are the three judicial review standards. Compared to the rational basis test, the intermediate and strict scrutiny tests are thought to be more demanding.
In situations where neither fundamental rights nor dubious classifications are at stake, the rational basis test is typically applied.
To know more about judicial review, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28179489
#SPJ4
Shortly after his election, Jackson became an advocate of what he called the _____________ ___________, or a heavy rotation of government officials after an election.
Shortly after his election, Jackson became an advocate of what he called the Spoils system, or a heavy rotation of government officials after an election.
What is Spoils system?The spoils system, also known as the patronage system, is a process whereby the political party that wins an election rewards its campaign workers and other active supporters by appointing them to government positions and providing them with other favors. Jackson supported the idea of switching up those in elected positions. Additionally called the "spoils system," this was. Jackson maintained the idea that public offices should be rotated among party members in his first annual message to Congress, saying that doing so would assist the country advance its republican values. The method of selecting and removing federal employees when presidential administrations changed in the 19th century was referred to as "The Spoils System." It is also referred to as a patronage system.To learn more about Spoils system refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10318684
#SPJ4
identify the competing roles society places on law enforcement officers and how that can influence behavior
The conflicting expectations society has of law enforcement officials and how it could affect their behaviour: Crime fighter vs. Public Servant
Conflicts over meetings arise when competing events try to occupy the same time slot in your calendar. While we're concentrating on meetings in this post, there are other types of conflicts that might arise with regard to scheduling, such as appointments, events, crises, daily routines, and task work. Because you are unsure of what to do or what to believe and are unable to decide between highly varied thoughts, sentiments, or beliefs: Both politicians and regular people tend to have mixed feelings about gaming. The personalities of high-conflict individuals (HCPs) are high-conflict. This indicates that they frequently engage in all-or-nothing thinking, uncontrolled emotions, extreme conduct or threats, and an obsession with blaming others.
Learn more about conflicting here
https://brainly.com/question/23050407
#SPJ4
TO1: Identify the competing roles society places on law enforcement officers and how that can influence behavior
you can die because an unsafe drug is approved, but you can also die because a safe drug has not yet been approved. this situation is called: please choose the correct answer from the following choices, and then select the submit answer button. answer choices
In relation to the average amount of controlled substance consumed by the registrant, a significant loss can be either a trend of minor losses over time or a single, significant loss.
What is significant loss?Any prescription drug loss that exceeds a reasonable threshold set by comparable parties and necessitates reporting to the board, as well as any loss that is mandated by the DEA or other state or federal agencies for controlled substances and prescription drugs, is referred to as a "significant loss."
A regulated substance must not be taken or used improperly. A significant loss can be a series of minor losses over time or a single, one-time loss that is proportional to the typical amount of controlled substances consumed by the registrant.
Theft or major loss of any controlled substance, disposal container, or listed chemical must be reported in writing to the Field Division Office of the Administration in the registrant's region within one business day, according to federal laws.
Therefore, the answer is drug loss.
To learn more about significant loss refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/11399191
#SPJ4
The Whitleblower protection law protect employee from reprial for dicloing information that they reaonably believe how what type of evidence?
Employees are shielded from reprisal by the whistleblower protection law if they reveal material they feasibly believe to be proof of misbehavior or unlawful activities.
The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) offers protection to Federal employees and job applicants who lawfully reveal information they reasonably believe shows the breaking of a law, rule, or regulation, serious financial mismanagement, serious power abuse, or a significant and specific risk to the public's health or safety. According to the WPA, certain Federal workers are not permitted to take, neglect to take, threaten to take, or take any personnel action against an employee or applicant for employment because the employee or applicant made a protected whistleblowing disclosure.
To know more about Whitleblower protection law click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/3520729#
#SPJ4
Which statement about the federal lawmaking process is true?
All newly proposed bills must be first introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives.
O Subcommittees and committees have the power to review and can edit proposed bills.
O When there are similar bills in each part of Congress, the U.S. Senate version will be passed on.
O If the president chooses to veto a bill, it is then sent on to the state legislatures for consideration.
Answer: The answer is B: Subcommittees and committees have the power to review and can edit proposed bills.
Explanation:
I got it right on the test.
The statement that is true about the federal lawmaking process is that
Subcommittees and committees have the power to review and can edit proposed bills. Option A
Determining true statement on lawmakingIn the U.S. legislative process, after a bill is introduced, a series of committee review and revise to ensure it conforms to the standard. These committees, including subcommittees, have the power to review the proposed bills, hold hearings, make necessary amendments, and recommend changes before sending them to the full chamber for further consideration.
This step is a very essential part of the legislative process, where bills can be thoroughly examined and modified before being voted upon by the entire legislative body.
Read on Lawmaking on https://brainly.com/question/31166823
#SPJ2
which of the following statements about just-in-time (jit) systems is/are correct? multiple select question. jit is often used to describe lean systems. conversion to jit systems entail some risk. jit systems require minimal coordination and effort. jit systems are demand driven.
Using a just-in-time (JIT) inventory system, a business can get products as soon as feasible before they are actually needed.
What is just-in-time JIT system list out its main benefits?In a just-in-time (JIT) inventory system, products are delivered to a business as close to the time of real need as is feasible. As a result, if an auto assembly factory wants to install airbags, it doesn't have a supply on hand; instead, it gets them as the vehicles pass through the assembly line.
avoidance of overproduction reducing transportation expenses and wait times. reducing resource consumption by streamlining your production processes lowering the amount of money that is invested in shares.
Reduce waste, boost cash flow, increase flexibility, make the most of human resources, and promote team empowerment with just-in-time inventory management. Companies who are adept at JIT inventory management improve profitability by minimizing stock investment. To manage inventory, they employ data.
Therefore, the correct answer are:
JIT systems are demand driven,
JIT is often used to describe Lean systems,
Conversion to JIT systems entail some risk.
To learn more about just-in-time JIT system refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/18805214
#SPJ4
