Answer:
t
Explanation:
for each of the following situations: would a court likely hold ursula liable for copyright infringement? why or why not? if not, is there some other intellectual property rule that may apply? be sure to explain your answer
A copyrighted work is generally considered to have been violated when it is copied, distributed, performed, publicly displayed, or transformed into a derivative work without the owner's consent.
What is copyright infringement?If someone knew about the infringement or had reason to know about it, they may be held accountable as a contributory infringer. Contributory infringers include those who intentionally instigate, cause, or materially contribute to copyright infringement.
If the defendant knew or should have known about the infringement and purposefully [caused] [materially contributed to] that infringement.
Any reproduction, distribution, performance, public exhibition, or creation of a derivative work involving a copyrighted work that is done without the owner's consent constitutes copyright infringement.
Any of these works' copyright holders have the right to sue anyone who violates their intellectual property to stop the violation.
To learn more about copyright infringement refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14855154
#SPJ4
which of the following scenarios best illustrates the concept of concurrent powers? responses the president negotiates a treaty regarding climate change with foreign governments, but for the treaty to take effect, it requires approval by the senate. the president negotiates a treaty regarding climate change with foreign governments, but for the treaty to take effect, it requires approval by the senate. as commander-in-chief of the military, the president orders troops to a foreign nation to address a potential threat to national security. as commander-in-chief of the military, the president orders troops to a foreign nation to address a potential threat to national security. a senate committee holds a hearing to discuss potential misuse of funds by the department of veterans affairs. a senate committee holds a hearing to discuss potential misuse of funds by the department of veterans affairs. the federal government provides about 25% of the total funding for highways and transit in the united states, while the other 75% of the funding comes from states.
About 25% of the nation's total financing for roadways and transit comes from the federal government, with the remaining 75% coming from the states.
In the United States, financing for transportation is provided by both the federal and state governments, demonstrating concurrent authority. Powers that are shared by the federal and state governments are known as concurrent powers. Congress, the President, and the Federal courts in that order have authority over the three separate branches of the federal government: the legislative, executive, and judicial. Australia, the Federal Republic of Germany, and the United States are a few examples. Federal denotes the coexistence of a federal and state government. In a "republic," decisions are made by the people, who also choose representatives to carry them out. Among other things, these enumerated powers include the ability to levy taxes, control commerce, establish a uniform naturalization law, create federal courts (subordinate to the Supreme Court), create and maintain a military, and declare war.
Learn more about federal government here
https://brainly.com/question/12486518
#SPJ4
What form is used to request a background investigation?
-SF 702
-SF 86
-Sf 312
-SF 700
SF86
SF86 is a form used to request a background investigation of a person who needs national security.
It collects information and analyzes the risk of the eligibility of access classified national security, and in a position to acquire the protection of a nation as a whole.
There are different types of background checkups. The term security clearance can be used when a person is most useful to a nation and his protection is concerned with the protection of the nation.
Then, the top secret is some types of security checkups. Some examples of investigations are ANACI, BI, MBI, NACLC, etc.
Depending on the investigation levels of the need for security these measures can take place.
To know more about background investigation
brainly.com/question/30244932
#SPJ4
courts have defined interstate commerce (which the u.s. congress has the power to regulate) as the sale or exchange of goods, services, or information between...
On February 4, 1887, the Senate and the House passed the Interstate Commerce Act, which applied the "Commerce Clause" of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power "to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the many States," to controlling railroad rates.
The Commerce Clause outlines a power that is enumerated in the US Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). According to the provision, the US Congress has the authority "to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the various States, and with the Indian Tribes." Each of these three areas of trade has typically been discussed by courts and observers as a distinct congressional power. It is typical to hear the terms "Foreign Commerce Clause," "Interstate Commerce Clause," and "Indian Commerce Clause" used to refer to the various parts of the Commerce Clause. Regarding the scope of the powers granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause, there is litigation in the courts. In order to view these abilities more broadly and expansively, it is sometimes combined with the Necessary and Proper Clause, as is mentioned below.
Learn more about Commerce Clause here
https://brainly.com/question/846709
#SPJ4
When “Great Balls of Fire” played on the jukebox at Brother Jimmy’s BBQ, the bartender poured Bacardi rum onto the bar and lit it on fire. The flame blew back into the bottle of rum and the burning contents shot out. A patron was severely burned and sued the restaurant and Bacardi claiming strict liability. Is Bacardi guilty of Strict Liability? Why or Why Not?
Whether Bacardi is guilty of strict liability in this situation depends on the specific laws and regulations in place in the jurisdiction where the incident occurred.
Strict liability is a legal principle that holds a person or company liable for damages caused by their product, regardless of whether they were negligent or not. It is often applied in cases involving dangerous or defective products, such as a bottle of rum that is prone to causing fires.
If the jurisdiction recognizes strict liability in product liability cases, and the rum bottle is found to be defective or dangerous, Bacardi may be held strictly liable for the damages caused by the incident. However, it is also possible that the restaurant or the bartender could be held liable for how the rum was used, if it can be proven that they were negligent in handling the bottle, or if there was a lack of warning or safety measures in place.
It's important to note that each jurisdiction has its own laws, regulations and specific cases, so it would require a review of the facts and the law in question to determine if Bacardi is guilty of strict liability in this situation.
true/false.. although the eu can influence the practices of businesses located in non-eu member countries, microsoft has been able to maintain business in the eu much as it conducts business in the united states.
The IMF monitors both the global economy and the economies of its members, loans to those having balance of payments issues, and assists its members directly business.
Prior to joining the World Bank Group, nations must first become members of the IMF; currently, each organization has 189 members. Laws and regulations govern how formal institutions function. They demand that each member sign a written pledge. Local town/city administrations and the American government are two examples of informal, normative institutions business. Because none of the "member countries" of the IMF are sovereign states, none of them are United Nations members. The IMF supports national capacity-building efforts and works to advance global macroeconomic and financial stability by offering policy recommendations. The European Parliament is directly elected by and represents the people of the EU member states. Together with the European Union Council, it makes decisions regarding European laws.
Learn more about business here :
https://brainly.com/question/27882512?
#SPJ4
Why were many state legislators initially hesitant to create a state police force?
Responses
They believed that it was the responsibility of the federal government to patrol highways.
They did not think the state could afford to pay the salaries of state police officers.
They did not want to have to worry about receiving traffic tickets as they traveled to and from the capital.
Several states had created state police forces that did not represent the people of the state but carried out the wishes of wealthy industrialists.
Answer: All of the given responses are reasons why many state legislators were initially hesitant to create a state police force.
They believed that it was the responsibility of the federal government to patrol highways.
They did not think the state could afford to pay the salaries of state police officers.
They did not want to have to worry about receiving traffic tickets as they traveled to and from the capital.
Several states had created state police forces that did not represent the people of the state but carried out the wishes of wealthy industrialists.
Additionally, some legislators may also have concerns about the potential for abuse of power by a state police force or the potential for the state police to be used as a tool of political oppression by those in power.
letting the sun in 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 the most basic way for citizens to hold leaders responsible is by voting in elections and by serving on juries in open courtroom proceedings. but these are not the only ways. in the united states and in other democracies, citizens can influence government on a daily basis, not just on election day. numerous other opportunities can, and should, exist to ensure that both elected and non-elected public officials remain accountable to the people. in the united states, when executive branch officials get together to conduct government business, they are often required to announce their meetings in advance and to hold them in forums that are open to the public. the law underlying this practice, a federal statute dubbed the
The law underlying the above practice, a federal statute dubbed the sunshine laws or open meeting laws. With a few significant exceptions, most sessions of federal and state agencies and regulatory organizations must be open to the public in accordance with open meeting rules, commonly known as sunshine laws.
Although the Freedom of Information Act of 1966 and laws governing open meetings are closely related, neither the First Amendment nor any national minimum standards define "openness." The question of whether certain exceptions warrant closing particular meetings of governmental organizations has dominated a significant portion of litigation about open meeting laws. Laws requiring open meetings are a recent phenomenon. They protect the public's right to have access to all aspects of government operations. This "right" cannot be linked to the shared common law system between America and England.
To know more about sunshine laws:
https://brainly.com/question/1238944
#SPJ4
A provider who violates the Civil False Claims Act may have to pay a Civil Mentary Penalty (CMP) of $20,000 for each false claim.
A. True
B. False
A provider who violates the Civil False Claims Act may have to pay a Civil Mentary Penalty (CMP) of $20,000 for each false claim. is false.
What constitutes resource misuse, such as?Any resource misuse, including the excessive use of services or other methods that directly or indirectly add needless expenses to the Medicare Program, is considered waste.Once a corrective action plan has been implemented, it is necessary to review the corrective measures on a yearly basis to make sure they are working. Anyone who willfully files fraudulent claims to the government is accountable for five times the losses the offender caused the government, in addition to a fine.Act Against False Claims [31 U.S.C.,It is against the law to submit Medicare or Medicaid payment claims that you know to be false or fraudulent. False claim filing is punishable by fines of up to three times the program's loss plus $11,000 for each claim.To learn more about Civil False Claims Act refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24322083
#SPJ4
to reduce the loss of life and property and to protect a nation's institutions from all types of hazards.
In order to secure a country's institutions from all threats, emergency preparedness entails taking proactive steps to reduce the loss of life and property.
The phrase describes the measures you take to ensure your safety before, during, and after a crisis or natural disaster. These preparations are crucial for your safety during both natural and man-made disasters. An emergency plan outlines how to deal with abrupt or unforeseen crises, according to the Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. To be prepared to: Prevent fatalities and injuries Reduce property, cattle, and equipment damage. It contains a list of procedures to follow in the event of such circumstances. It demonstrates how to take preventive measures, get ready for bad situations, minimize them, and maintain positive control in those situations in order to preserve lives and lessen property damage.
Learn more about Emergency preparedness here
https://brainly.com/question/5716389
#SPJ4
Emergency preparedness consists of ______ to reduce the loss of life and property and to protect a nation's institutions from all types of hazards.
consider the following passages that seem to describe aspects of the magna carta. more than one of these passages is accurate. however, at least one is not accurate. select all the passages that are true. group of answer choices this document is credited with establishing the principle that the english government, even with its king as its head of state, was subject to the rule of law, which is the essential idea upon which the united states constitution is based. the magna carta is the original source of the bedrock idea in the united states constitution that all people owe a debt of public service in exchange for their freedom; in fact, the united states constitution directly borrowed the privileges and freedoms clause from the famous twelfth paragraph in the magna carta. english king john reluctantly agreed to sign and place his seal on the great charter at runnymeade, england in 1215 in order to essentially make peace between himself and a group of disaffected english noblemen and barons. it was the great survey of much of england, completed in 1086 by order of the english king william i, the document marked a revolutionary step forward in recording public records, which allowed for improved government administration.
In order to essentially make peace with a group of disgruntled English noblemen and barons, English King John grudgingly consented to sign and put his mark on the Great Charter in 1215 at Runnymeade, England.
The fundamental premise on which the United States Constitution is based that the English government, even with its king as its head of state, was subject to the rule of law was established by this text. The United Kingdom includes the nation of England. With Wales to the west and Scotland to the north, it has shared land borders. Northwest and southwest, respectively, are the Irish Sea and the Celtic Sea. The English Channel to the south and the North Sea to the east divide it from mainland Europe. Over 100 smaller islands, including the Isles of Scilly and the Isle of Wight, are part of the country, which takes up five-eighths of the North Atlantic island of Great Britain.
Learn more about England here
https://brainly.com/question/21221749
#SPJ4
In regards to a life insurance contract, which of the following statements is NOT true regarding the concept of insurable interest?Individuals are assumed to have insurable interest in themselvesInsurable interest is established by a court of lawInsurable interest can be established sufficiently by sentimental attachment aloneInsurable interest must exist at the time of the application
Insurable interest can be established sufficiently by sentimental attachment alone is NOT TRUE In regards to a life insurance contract, true regarding the concept of insurable interest.
the attachment that a person has to anything, such as a piece of property or another person, such that they would lose out if the property or person were damaged. Only things or people in that you hold an insurable interest may be insured, according to insurance law. Any investment that is vulnerable to financial loss is protected by insurable interest. When the loss or damage of the object will result in a financial loss or other troubles, that individual or corporation has an insurable interest in that thing, event, or action. A individual or organization would purchase an insurance policy to cover the specific person, thing, or event in order to safeguard an insurable interest.
To know more about Insurable interest:
https://brainly.com/question/28938508
#SPJ4
if you have an accident, the law requires you to exchange your drivers license information with: firefighters security guards others involved in the accident submit answer
if you have an accident, the law requires you to exchange your drivers license information with Security guards
How to avoid accident?Around the world, the 4 E's—education, enforcement, engineering, environment, and emergency care for victims of traffic accidents—have been the main focus of accident prevention and control. Drive according to the posted speed restrictions on the different roads. Keep in mind that "speed thrills but kills."Before operating a bicycle, motorcycle, or car, always wear seat belts, helmets, and other safety gear. Overspeeding, reckless driving, breaking the law, misreading traffic signs, being tired, and drinking are all examples of driver error. Pedestrian: Ignorance, erroneous crossings, traveling on the carriageway, and jaywalkers.The law mandates that you give security personnel information from your driver's license in the event of an accident.
To learn more about avoid accident refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/24622288
#SPJ4
WHEN CAN failure of election be declared?.
Answer:When “Great Balls of Fire” played on the jukebox at Brother Jimmy’s BBQ, the bartender poured Bacardi rum onto the bar and lit it on fire. The flame blew back into the bottle of rum and the burning contents shot out. A patron was severely burned and sued the restaurant and Bacardi claiming strict liability. Is Bacardi guilty of Strict Liability? Why or Why Not?
Explanation: pls i need help
sandra enters into a contract to sell her home to paul. under the statute of frauds, in order to be legally enforceable, the written contract must name the contracting parties, identify the subject matter of the contract, and .
Paul and Sandra sign a deal for Sandra to sell her house. Under the statute of frauds, the written contract must name the contracting parties, identify the subject matter of the contract, and Present the essential terms and conditions of the contract.
Sandra Ann Lauer (born 18 May 1962), also known by her stage names Sandra and Sandra Cretu, is a Franco-German pop singer who achieved mainstream success in the 1980s and early 1990s with a number of European hit singles produced by her ex-husband and musical collaborator, Michael Cretu. These songs include "(I'll Never Be) Maria Magdalena" (1985), "In the Heat of the Night" (1985), "Everlasting Love" (1987), "Secret Land (1992). Sandra has received excellent praise from critics for her albums Into a Secret Land (1988) and Close to Seven (1992). Before starting a solo career, Sandra was the lead vocalist of the all-female disco group Arabesque, which enjoyed tremendous success in the Soviet Union and Japan. She also contributed vocals to the albums that were released between 1990 and 2001 by the hugely popular musical project Enigma, which had top 10 songs in the UK and North America. Sandra, a cult celebrity with a devoted following, is still regarded as one of the most well-liked singers from the 1980s in Continental Europe. She even outsold Madonna at one point in time in a few different nations during the height of her fame. Sandra has cemented her status as the most successful German female vocalist with global record sales of more than 33 million.
Learn more about Sandra here
https://brainly.com/question/16664598
#SPJ4
Two homeowners who own adjacent lots decided to construct a driveway that straddles their common property line. They entered into a written agreement whereby each granted to the other a right of access over his property in accord with the dimensions and location of the driveway and each promised that he, his heirs, devisees, assignees and successors would equally share the repair and maintenance of the driveway, including the cost of snow removal, with the neighboring property owner. This agreement was promptly and properly recorded. After the driveway was built, the owner of one of the improved lots sold it in fee simple absolute to a buyer who currently lives on the premises. A year ago, the owner of the other lot died. His property passed by intestacy to his son. Through an oral agreement, the son, who has a residence elsewhere, has rented out the inherited residence to a tenant for a one-year term. The son told the tenant of the shared maintenance agreement with the neighbor, but otherwise did not discuss the maintenance of the driveway with the tenant. This past winter, due to a number of heavy snowfalls, the removal of the snow in order to be able to use the driveway was costly. When the tenant contacted the current owner of the neighboring property, the owner, noting that he rarely used the driveway due to his advanced age and poor health, refused to reimburse the tenant for the snow removal costs borne by the tenant.If the tenant seeks to recover half of the costs for snow removal from the current neighbor, who will prevail?A. The tenant, because the tenant acted in reliance to his detriment on the son's revelation of the agreement.B. The tenant, because the agreement contains a covenant that runs with land.C. The neighbor, because only the son can enforce the agreement.D. The neighbor, because there was no horizontal privity between the neighbors who entered into the agreement.
The tenant, because the agreement contains a covenant that runs with land.
What is an agreement?A contract is a written agreement between two or more parties that outlines specific, legally binding rights and duties for each party. In most cases, a contract entails the transfer of products, services, money, or a promise to transfer any of those at a later time.An agreement is a sign of two or more people's consent to one another. It occurs through an offer and an acceptance and represents a coming together of the minds with a shared goal. Words, behaviour, and in certain circumstances even silence may all be used to demonstrate an agreement.To learn more about agreement refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15193799
#SPJ4
Brian is formally collecting information for a case to ensure both sides have time to review and obtain answering evidence, it called?
Collecting information for a case to ensure both sides have time to review and obtain answering evidence is called Discovery.
What is Brian doing ?and why?Brian is in the process of collecting information and evidence for a case before it goes to trial.This process is known as discovery, which allows both sides to review and obtain evidence that will be used in the case.During discovery, Brian may request documents, witness statements, or other forms of evidence from the opposing side.This process is important to ensure that both sides have a fair and equal opportunity to present their case in court.Discovery also allows both sides to identify any potential weaknesses in their case and address them before trial.It also helps to narrow down the issues in dispute and to identify potential areas of agreement.Discovery is a key step in the legal process and is designed to ensure that both sides have all the information they need to make informed decisions about their case.
To learn more about discovery refer:
brainly.com/question/28178921
#SPJ4
The government may take property for public ue if it reaonably believe that taking it will _____. Provide profit for the government
provide profit for the public
benefit the government
benefit the public
If the government has a good faith belief that taking the property will benefit the government, it may seize it for public purposes. A constitutional right recognized by the Fifth Amendment is the right of eminent domain.
Private property is taken through eminent domain condemnation proceedings, where owners may challenge the legality of the takeover and bargain over the just compensation amount.
The most straightforward instances of condemnation include the seizing of property to make place for a public project. In order to construct highways, it may also be necessary to take private property's airspace, water, dirt, lumber, and rock.
As part of the FY 2015 budget, Congress approved a law preventing the Federal Housing Administration from financing mortgages taken by eminent domain.
To learn more about eminent domain, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/28426338
#SPJ4
which of the following are examples of local laws in other countries and their associated penalties? (check all that apply.)
Option 1 is Correct. Following are a few examples of regional laws from other nations and the punishments they entail that fall under diplomatic immunity.
As the main court of the United Nations, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) was established in 1946. (UN). One of the four major categories you could run into is common law. The other two are civil law, religious law, and customary law. A hybrid system is used in several nations by combining more than one of these systems at once.
The laws and guidelines that control how states interact with one another, with other states and individuals, and with other international organisations collectively make up international law.
Learn more about penalties Visit: brainly.com/question/28605893
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
Which of the following are examples of local laws in other countries and their associated penalties? (check all that apply.):
1. diplomatic immunity
2. prohibition against genocide
3. regulation of antitrust law
4. prohibition against price fixing
procedural due process is a doctrine of the supreme court that negated numerous laws in the first third of the 20th century. its use in the past 80 years is greatly diminished, but it survives in terms of protecting substantive liberties not otherwise enumerated in the constitution.
Substantive due process was used in the past 80 years is greatly diminished, but it survives in terms of protecting substantive liberties not otherwise enumerated in the constitution.
The takings clause, substantive due process, and procedural due process are the three main components of the Fifth Amendment. The amendment forbids the government from unilaterally threatening the life of a suspected criminal in terms of due process. Fairness in the courtroom is also required by the constitution in civil actions. The court's review of substantive due process concerns is two-tiered. Legislation pertaining to economic issues, labor rights, and other business issues is only lightly regulated by the courts in the first tier. This implies that a law can only be overturned if it accomplishes no legitimate governmental goal. Legislation pertaining to basic rights is subject to "heightened judicial examination" under the upper tier, which means that it won't pass unless it's "narrowly tailored to suit a meaningful government objective."
Learn more about substantive here
https://brainly.com/question/29392513
#SPJ4
true/false. statement of timothy j. mayopoulos, before the united states house of representatives committee on oversight and government reform and subcommittee on domestic policy, part iv, nov. 17, 2009
True. statement of timothy j. mayopoulos, before the united states house of representatives committee on oversight and government reform and subcommittee on domestic policy, part iv, Nov. 17, 2009.
Tim has a lengthy background in the financial industry. Tim is a member of the governing boards of SAIC, a software processor for the civilian, defense, and national security departments of the U.S. government, and LendingClub, the top digital marketplaces bank in the country. Tim works with several private businesses as a chairman or advisor. Questions have been raised regarding the legal counsel the company got over whether or not to disclose to shareholders the size of the prospective year-end bonus in the light of the Securities and Exchange Commission's ongoing lawsuit against Bank of America. Employee pool for Merrill Lynch. I don't believe I was involved in this matter in any way. Neither the disclosure schedule nor the merger agreement's clauses pertaining to the Merrill Lynch workers' bonus pool were negotiated or written by me. It was handled by other people. Regarding transparency, I did not participate in the creation of the proxy statement that was delivered to shareholders to request their consent to the transaction.
Learn more about shareholders here
https://brainly.com/question/29803660
#SPJ4
Miranda rights are required when:
a. a suspect is being booked.
b. a suspect is being questioned.
c. a suspect is being arrested.
d. a suspect is in custody and being questioned.
Answer:
d. a suspect is in custody and being questioned.
which of the following states that government action need only have a reasonable relation to the achievement of a legitimate government purpose to be constitutional? multiple choice intermediate scrutiny due process of law full scrutiny rational basis test
Rational basis test states that government action need only have a reasonable relation to the achievement of a legitimate government purpose to be constitutional.
The rational basis test is type of test used in the process of judicial review. When the court is conducting a judicial review, it is essentially determining the constitutionality of a statute or ordinance.
The term "rational review" is another name for the rational basic test.
The statute or ordinance must have a valid state interest and a rational connection between its means and aims in order to pass the rational basis test.
The rational basis test, the intermediate scrutiny test, and the stringent scrutiny test are the three judicial review standards. Compared to the rational basis test, the intermediate and strict scrutiny tests are thought to be more demanding.
In situations where neither fundamental rights nor dubious classifications are at stake, the rational basis test is typically applied.
To know more about judicial review, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28179489
#SPJ4
What is revealed in Henry Jekyll's full statement of the case?.
Answer:
Chapter 10 - Henry Jekyll's Full Statement of the Case
Jekyll tells the story of how he turned into Hyde. It began as scientific curiosity in the duality of human nature (or the good and evil), and his attempt to destroy the 'darker self'.
texas real estate license holders may determine whether they are using the correct version of a trec form by
Texas real estate license holders may determine whether they are using the correct version of a trec form by verifying current forms on the TREC websites.
What protections does the Texas Real Estate Licensing Act offer?Texas Real Estate License Act protects the statute provides a code of ethics and a standard of conduct for real estate salespeople and brokers in terms of how they should handle customers and other competitors. It outlines the disciplinary processes, fines, and legal or criminal responsibility.when the customer requests the use of a different form. Transactions for which a contract form has been created by a principal to the transaction are an exemption to the requirement that TREC-promulgated forms be used, according to Section 537.11(a)(3).TREC does not provide forms for commercial property, listing or buyer representation agreements, or contracts for property management.To learn more about TREC refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/14279349
#SPJ4
the security guard is given authority to arrest by:* new york state lawmon law.employers policies and procedures.all of the above.T/F
In New York state, security guards do not have the legal authority to make arrests. Only law enforcement officers, such as police officers, have the authority to make arrests.so the statement is false.
What is law enforcement?Common law, which is a body of legal principles that are based on judicial decisions and not statutory laws, does not grant security guards the authority to make arrests.Employers may grant security guards the authority to make arrests through their policies and procedures, but such authority would be limited to the specific property or area for which the security guard is responsible.It is important to note that private citizens, including security guards, can make a citizen's arrest under certain circumstances. However, the circumstances under which a citizen's arrest can be made are limited, and the individual making the arrest must have probable cause to believe that the person being arrested has committed a crime.In summary, the security guard is not given authority to arrest by New York State Law or Common Law. Employers may give them the authority to arrest under specific circumstances but it is limited to their property or area they are responsible for.To learn more about law enforcement refer:
brainly.com/question/21082629
#SPJ4
which civil trial right is protected by the seventh amendment?
The right to a civil trial by jury in civil cases is protected by the Seventh Amendment.
The Oireachtas may alter the process for electing senators from graduates of particular universities under Ireland's Constitution's seventh amendment. The Pakistani Constitution's seventh amendment permits the Prime Minister to ask for a vote of confidence to be held through a nationwide referendum. South Africa's constitution underwent its seventh amendment, which changed a number of clauses relating to how Parliament should handle financial issues and how the federal and provincial governments should interact financially. The Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution stipulates that some civil actions must be tried by a jury and forbids cases from being reviewed by a different court.
Learn more about Seventh Amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/18341971
#SPJ4
A broker-dealer is registering a security in a State by coordination. In doing so, the broker-dealer files the necessary paperwork with the SEC and is compliant with the:
A. Securities Act of 1933
B. Investment Advisers Act of 1940
C. Investment Company Act of 1940
D. ERISA of 1974
A
The correct response is A. Securities Act of 1933. A broker-dealer registers a security in a State. In doing so, the broker-dealer complies with the following requirements and submits the required paperwork with the SEC: Securities Act of 1933.
The US Congress passed the Securities Act of 1933 on May 27, 1933, during the height of the Great Depression and in the wake of the 1929 stock market crash. It is also referred to as the Securities Act, the Truth in Securities Act, the Federal Securities Act, and the '33 Act. It is an essential component of American securities regulation. The Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause serves as the basis for this legislation. Unless there is a legal exemption, the 1933 Act mandates that every offer and sale of securities that utilizes the channels and tools of interstate commerce be registered with the SEC. By attempting to offer or sell a security without employing a "instrumentality" of interstate commerce, it is practically difficult to evade the application of the legislation since the term "means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce" is so broad. To make the transaction subject to the Act, it would likely only take the use of a telephone or the mail.
Learn more about Securities Act of 1933 here
https://brainly.com/question/17162129
#SPJ4
liability for illegal alcohol sales can be any of the following except
Except for Private, any of the following may be held accountable for illicit alcohol sales. In civil cases, bars, restaurants, and other businesses with licenses to sell and/or serve alcoholic beverages may be held accountable for doing so unlawfully.
Due to the fact that individuals under the age of 21 are not permitted to consume alcohol, dram shop rules also cover injuries caused by minors who were provided alcohol by authorized facilities (with only minimal exceptions in some states, often for religious purposes).
A close relative who was financially reliant on the deceased or the executor of their estate would be given the authority to launch a civil case in the majority of states in the event that an innocent individual passed away.
To learn more about illegal alcohol sales, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/29596163
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Liability for illegal alcohol sales can be any of the following EXCEPT:
Civil
Private
Criminal
Administrative
Which statement about the federal lawmaking process is true?
All newly proposed bills must be first introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives.
O Subcommittees and committees have the power to review and can edit proposed bills.
O When there are similar bills in each part of Congress, the U.S. Senate version will be passed on.
O If the president chooses to veto a bill, it is then sent on to the state legislatures for consideration.
Answer: The answer is B: Subcommittees and committees have the power to review and can edit proposed bills.
Explanation:
I got it right on the test.
The statement that is true about the federal lawmaking process is that
Subcommittees and committees have the power to review and can edit proposed bills. Option A
Determining true statement on lawmakingIn the U.S. legislative process, after a bill is introduced, a series of committee review and revise to ensure it conforms to the standard. These committees, including subcommittees, have the power to review the proposed bills, hold hearings, make necessary amendments, and recommend changes before sending them to the full chamber for further consideration.
This step is a very essential part of the legislative process, where bills can be thoroughly examined and modified before being voted upon by the entire legislative body.
Read on Lawmaking on https://brainly.com/question/31166823
#SPJ2
