Plaintiff in the case was Aetna Casualty & Surety Company.
The court decided that Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of diversity jurisdiction or, alternatively, motion to join a necessary party and motion to remand, is denied.
Who is a plaintiff?The party who brings a lawsuit (sometimes referred to as an action) before a court is known as the plaintiff.
The plaintiff is looking for a legal remedy by doing this. If the search is successful, the court will rule in the plaintiff's favor and issue the necessary orders (e.g., an order for damages).
In most English-speaking countries, the term "plaintiff" is used in civil cases. Notable exceptions include Scotland, where the term "pursuer" has always been used, and England and Wales, where the term "claimant" has been used since the Civil Procedure Rules were introduced in 1999.
The prosecutor in a criminal proceeding presents the evidence against the defendant, however the main complainant is frequently referred to as the "complainant".
Learn more on plaintiff here https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
which of the following accurately describe reasons why the common law courts rose to become the predominant courts during the early development of the english common law?
The common law courts rose to become the predominant courts during the early development of the english common law to administer law in a uniform manner.
Common law, the body of law created by the court, is frequently set apart from statute rules and regulations, that are pieces of legislation issued by the legislator and executive branch, respectively. Judicial precedent contrasts with statutes in judicial systems that uphold the common law and is on an equal footing with them. The legal system, which codifies basic legal concepts into legal codes but does not recognize judicial judgements as binding, is the other primary legal system utilized by nations. Systems of civil law distinguish clearly between secondary and primary sources. Enacted legislation, custom, and "general principles of law" are primary sources. In civil law systems, the enacted legislation is the main source of these. In a civil legal system, a code is a list of broad rules that are prioritized. Before the specific problem can be evaluated, there may be initial general laws governing fundamental problems that must be addressed.
Learn more about common law here
https://brainly.com/question/13070537
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements about IACUC suspensions of animal activities is FALSE?
An IACUC member cannot stop a procedure on an animal upon observing it is a statements about IACUC suspensions of animal activities which is 'FALSE'.
What is IACUC ?The Animal Care and Use Program and all of its components are administered in accordance with the Public Health Service's (PHS) Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (the Policy) and Guide on the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (the Guide).
When it determines that it is necessary to protect animals or humans, the IACUC has the authority to halt animal activity aid in the creation of the grant application's basic science section.
IACUC members are powerless to stop animal manipulation once it has begun. If any of the following applies to your project: Research, training, or testing carried out with University oversight or direction, regardless of funding source.
To learn more about IACUC from the given link :
https://brainly.com/question/13045267
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Which of the following statements about IACUC suspensions of animal activities is FALSE?
-The IACUC must report a suspension to the IO, who must report it to regulatory agencies.
-An institutional official can suspend an activity without agreement by the IACUC.
-An IACUC member cannot stop a procedure on an animal upon observing it.
-A majority of a quorum must vote at a convened meeting to suspend an activity.
_____is a California counterpart to the federal anti-discrimination law with regards to blockbusting.
Answer:
The Rumford Act is a California counterpart to the federal anti-discrimination law concerning blockbusting.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
in year 1, the government spent more than it collected in tax revenue. in year 2, the government increased spending more with no other budget changes. which of the following is the most likely result from year 1 to year 2? (5 points)
The budget surplus would decrease. Budget deficits occur when a government spends more on transfers, commodities, and services than it receives in tax revenue.
Progressives believe that by political activity, human societies may be improved. Progressivism is a political philosophy that aims to improve social reform based on alleged improvements in science, technology, economic development, and social organization. Adherents believe that progressivism can be applied to all human communities and work to disseminate this belief. The Age of Enlightenment saw the rise of progressivism, which was motivated by the idea that new empirical knowledge was being used to manage society more effectively in Europe. Progressivism is frequently equated in contemporary political discourse with social liberalism, a left-leaning form of liberalism, as opposed to the right-leaning neoliberalism, which combines support for a mixed economy with cultural liberalism. An organization that calls itself progressive in the twenty-first century is "a social or political movement that seeks to represent the interests of common people through political reform and the backing of government activities."
Learn more about budget here
https://brainly.com/question/13964173
#SPJ4
a state that assumes primary responsibility for the social welfare of its citizens
The welfare state is a form of government in which the state or a well-established set of social organizations provide its citizens a minimum level of financial security.
The wellbeing of its citizens, both personally and socially, is by definition the responsibility of the government in a welfare state. A fjord, like the Sognefjord, is defined as a glacially overdeepened valley that is extended below sea level, typically narrow and steepsided, and naturally fills with seawater. It has been said that the Great Depression, World War I, and World War II all had a significant role in the development of the welfare state and the use of state interventionism to address issues like lost output, high unemployment, and other issues. a country whose administration is dedicated to improving economic and social well-being through wealth redistribution and other initiatives funded by the government. The Nordic countries, which have the highest social capital in the world, have high levels of civic engagement, ethnic homogeneity, social equality, and low levels of public corruption.
Learn more about welfare here :
https://brainly.com/question/7027071
#SPJ4
describe search warrants and how they can be used to obtain digital evidence by specifically answering each of the following questions:
According to the General Statute of the NC (n..), a search warrant is a court order authorizing a law enforcement agency to search a specific premises, vehicle or person.
The required details for search warrant in given paragraph
The purpose of the search warrant is to confiscate items to obtain evidence in court. The reason why a search warrant is needed is the Fourth Amendment. Per the Komorn Act (2015), the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the privacy of Americans, particularly from abusive searches. For this reason, a law enforcement officer must present a search warrant prior to a search, unless there are other legal exceptions or emergencies. How they can be used to obtain digital evidence, according to the International Association of Chief Police Officers for computer or electronic media, when there is a reasonable suspicion that such media contains evidence of a crime or the fruits of a crime. The search warrant must state where the search can be carried out and what is to be secured. If the electronic media subject to the search warrant contains evidence of a criminal offense, law enforcement should focus on the contents of the files and not the physical storage media.
It is good practice to detail all documents to be searched and seized, including the language in which the crime, suspects, and time frame may be specified. In addition, in exceptional cases, judges must indicate the methods by which the search must be carried out and explain why and how it must be restricted.
To learn more about digital evidence refer to:
brainly.com/question/28297033
#SPJ4
the actions of corporations that are intended to demonstrate the corporate wish to behave responsively take many forms and are conducted under the banner of:
Corporate Responsibility is the term used to refer to the actions of corporations that are intended to demonstrate the corporate wish to behave responsively take many forms.
Corporate responsibility (CR) deals with the principles and ethics that rest at the core of any organization when talking about its contribution to the society and to the environment.
Corporate responsibility emanates from the belief that it is essential for a business or organisation to be concerned and take actions for the betterment of the system in which it is operating.
Any business that could potentially damage the system will also have an adverse impact on the business itself making it unsustainable.
Companies can be aware of their impact on the economic, social, and environmental aspects of society by engaging in corporate social responsibility, often known as corporate citizenship.
To know more about Corporate Responsibility , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13528806
#SPJ4
a plaintiff sued a police officer for false arrest. the officer's defense was that, based on a description he heard over the police radio, he reasonably believed the plaintiff was an armed robbe
What the policeman overheard on the police radio is the major issue at trial. All three of the pieces of evidence the accused wants to allow are pertinent and admissible in relation to that matter.
The policeman can provide testimony regarding what he thought he heard. The radio readings made by the police dispatcher are admissible in court. To prove what the policeman heard, the note the patrol officer read from is acceptable. They are all relevant sorts of evidence that can help the fact finder make decisions. None of the above forms should be regarded as hearsay since they are not presented in order to prove the assertions made — namely, the identity of the armed robber — but rather to demonstrate how they affected the police officer who was listening. The police officer's testimony is also not susceptible to removal under the best available evidence criterion because it is not a document. These three pieces of evidence are all pertinent, and they cannot be neglected.
Learn more about testimony here
https://brainly.com/question/3635812
#SPJ4
Edshina lives in Florida. She is overseeing a transaction and wants to ensure the deed is recorded so she can ensure the public can pursue constructive notice. As her broker, you advise her to obtain:
As her broker, you would advise her to present the deed along with copies to the recorder's office in the county where the property is located as the first step.
In order to record a deed, you must go to the recorder's office in the county where the property is located and present the deed along with copies. It is important to make sure that all the necessary documents are provided to the recorder's office in order for the deed to be properly recorded.
After presenting all the required documents in the county, there will be a delivery and acceptance, a real estate deed becomes a public record when it is filed with the Recorder of Deeds. After recording the deed it will become very easy for the public to consider pursuing construction.
To know more about broker, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14094023
#SPJ4
which of the following is the correct pairing of powers found in the articles of confederation and powers found in the constitution? responses articles of confederation united states constitution protection of individual liberties no protection of specific individual rights articles of confederation united states constitution protection of individual liberties no protection of specific individual rights articles of confederation united states constitution powerful executive branch federal government supreme over states articles of confederation united states constitution powerful executive branch federal government supreme over states articles of confederation united states constitution unicameral legislature bicameral legislature articles of confederation united states constitution unicameral legislature bicameral legislature articles of confederation united states constitution amendment requires unanimity of all states amendment requires the president's approval
While the Constitution employs signing statements to create legislation, the Articles of Confederation stipulated that an amendment required the unanimous consent of all states.
Legislation is the action or outcome of a legislature, parliament, or comparable governing body enrolling, enacting, or promulgating laws. Before becoming law, a piece of legislation may be referred to as a bill. However, while it is still being considered, it may simply be referred to as "legislation" to separate it from other activity. Laws can be used to regulate, permit, forbid, furnish (funds), sanction, grant, declare, or impose limitations. A legislative act's jurisdiction may allow an executive or administrative body to compare it to a non-legislative act. A member of the legislature (such as a member of Congress or Parliament) or the executive usually proposes legislation, which is then discussed and frequently revised by other members of the legislature before being passed. Only a small portion of the proposals introduced during a given session are usually passed by the majority of large legislatures. Generally speaking, the government's legislative priorities determine whether a certain law will be submitted.
Learn more about legislation here
https://brainly.com/question/27893557
#SPJ4
An eight-lane highway has ________ pedestrian countdown period ___ a four-lane road.
A. the same; as
B. a longer; than
C. half the; of
D. a shorter; than
An eight-lane highway has a longer pedestrian countdown period than a four-lane road. Countdown pedestrian signals have a typical pedestrian signal with shapes and colors and an additional display that indicates how many seconds are remaining until it is safe to cross the roadway.
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) now considers countdown pedestrian signals to be the industry standard on the State Highway System. All new construction and any renovated traffic signal installations that affect pedestrians have countdowns implemented. The countdown time is determined by the distance traveled and the speed of walking. For example, a four-lane road would have a shorter countdown period than an eight-lane highway. A zero and a DON'T WALK or solid red hand signal the conclusion of the countdown period, which begins at the start of the DON'T START or flashing hands phase.
To know more about pedestrian:
https://brainly.com/question/29646515
#SPJ4
The amendments proposed by the various state conventions were considered to be a condition of ratification. true or false
The amendments proposed by the various state conventions were considered to be a condition of ratification. is false.
How can an amendment be ratified by state conventions?If two-thirds of the States ask for one, a convention may be convened for that purpose , or by a vote of both Houses of Congress, is required to propose an amendment. After then, the amendment must be approved by three-fourths of the State legislatures or three-fourths of the conventions summoned in each State for ratification.Any amendments put forth by that conference must be adopted by three-fourths of the states by a vote of either the state legislature or a state convention called for that purpose.To learn more about amendments refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/687600
#SPJ4
true/false. different aspects of the u.s. constitution as well as the debate between federalist no. 10 and brutus no. 1 reflect the tension between the broad participatory model and the more filtered participation of the pluralist and elite models.
It is true. because u.s. constitution as well as the debate between federalist no. 10 and brutus no. 1 reflect the tension between the broad participatory model and the more filtered participation of the pluralist and elite models.
What is meant by filtered ?
employing specialised equipment, remove particles from liquids or gases or specific forms of light: To get rid of any pollutants, the water is filtered.Simply said, filtered water is municipal tap water that has been put through carbon filters to reduce the chlorine concentration and enhance flavour.In rare cases, micron filters can be used in addition to carbon filters.By modifying the colours of the pixels, image filtering modifies the appearance of an image. The benefits of applying filters to photographs include boosting contrast and providing a number of interesting effects.See meaning's definition on Dictionary.com. nounintention, goal, nounmessage, and nounsignificationTo learn more about filtered refer to
https://brainly.com/question/23945157
#SPJ4
Civil liberties
a. are not particularly important in the United States.
b. limit government actions against individuals.
c. allow the government the freedom or liberty to do what is necessary to run the country.
d. are a threat to libertarians.
e. none of the above.
Civil liberties- (b) limit government actions against individuals. Protections from government action are provided by civil liberties. For instance, citizens are guaranteed the freedom to follow any religion they choose under the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights.
Therefore, government cannot impede someone's right to practice their religion freely. Individuals have "liberty" from the government's acts according to Amendment I. They guarantee that all individuals are treated equally and with respect and are a crucial component of any democracy. The right to life, liberty, and the ability to receive a fair trial are a few examples of fundamental liberties. We are shielded from governmental power by civil liberties. They have their roots in the Constitution's Bill of Rights, which places restrictions on the federal government's authority.
To know more about civil liberties:
https://brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ4
up to now, we've been measuring the percent transmittance of light passing through solutions. for this section, we're going to define two new quantities: transmittance and absorbance: transmittance (t) is the ratio of the intensity of light that remains after passing through a liquid compared to the original intensity before passing through the liquid: t
It is true that up until this point, we have only measured the percentage of light that solutions transmit. We will define transmittance and absorbance as two new terms in this section.
The ratio of the amount of light that is still present after passing through a liquid to its initial amount is known as the transmittance (t). A solution's absorbance is zero and its percent transmittance is 100% if all of the light flows through it undisturbed.
The % transmittance is 0 and the amount of absorption is unlimited if all the light is absorbed. The transmittance and the absorbance are inversely proportional, with an absorbance of 0 equivalent to a transmittance of 100% and an absorbance of 1 corresponding to a transmittance of 10%.
Learn more about transmittance Visit: brainly.com/question/24373056
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
State true or false : Up to now, we've been measuring the percent transmittance of light passing through solutions. for this section, we're going to define two new quantities: transmittance and absorbance: transmittance (t) is the ratio of the intensity of light that remains after passing through a liquid compared to the original intensity before passing through the liquid.
Should prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause?
The double jeopardy clause, as outlined in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, prohibits an individual from being tried for the same crime twice. This principle is intended to protect citizens from being subjected to the trauma and financial burden of multiple trials for the same offense. However, there is ongoing debate about whether prosecution for a crime in both state and federal courts should also be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause.
One argument for prohibiting prosecution in both state and federal courts is that it would prevent the government from using the legal system as a means of harassment or punishment. If an individual is acquitted or convicted in a state court, it would be unjust for them to be subjected to another trial in a federal court for the same crime. This would also prevent the government from using multiple trials as a means of securing a conviction, even if there is not enough evidence to support a guilty verdict in one court.
On the other hand, some argue that prosecution in both state and federal courts should not be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause because it allows for different levels of government to hold individuals accountable for their actions. For example, if a crime is committed on federal land or involves crossing state lines, it may be appropriate for both state and federal prosecutors to pursue charges. Additionally, some argue that prohibiting prosecution in both state and federal courts would hinder the government's ability to effectively combat organized crime or other complex criminal activities that may span multiple jurisdictions.
In conclusion, the double jeopardy clause is an important principle that is intended to protect citizens from being subjected to multiple trials for the same crime. However, whether prosecution in both state and federal courts should be prohibited by the double jeopardy clause is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the potential consequences for citizens and the government's ability to effectively combat crime.
True or False: in terms of compliance with the statute of frauds and the uniform commercial code, the signature of the person who is enforcing the contract is required.
True, in terms of compliance with the statute of frauds and the uniform commercial code, the signature of the person who is enforcing the contract is required.
What is statue of fraud?The statute of frauds is a legal principle that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing and signed by the parties in order to be enforceable.The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a set of laws that governs commercial transactions and also requires a signed writing for certain types of contracts.The purpose of the statute of frauds and the UCC is to prevent fraud and ensure that the terms of a contract are clear and enforceable.It's important to note that for a contract to be enforceable, it should be signed by the person who is enforcing it.In summary, it is true that in terms of compliance with the statute of frauds. The UCC and the statute of frauds are in place to prevent fraud and ensure that the terms of the contract are clear and enforceable.To learn more about statue of frauds refer:
brainly.com/question/29607080
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements about the contrast between common law systems and civil law systems is TRUE?
Comparing the two legal systems, common law nations place a greater emphasis on public judicial decisions than civil law systems do on codified statutes.
TRUE
Common law is a body of unwritten rules that are generally based on earlier court rulings, tribunal decisions, and customs and are frequently used in legal matters that cannot be governed by existing statutes. Contrarily, civil law is a body of laws that governs private or individual affairs such as family, marriage, property, contracts, and so forth.
Contracts written under a common law system tend to be longer than contracts written under a civil law system when comparing the two legal systems.
Learn more about civil law .
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ4
a pedestrian sued a defendant for injuries he suffered after the defendant allegedly drove his car through a red light and struck the pedestrian in a crosswalk. at trial, a woman who had seen the accident testified that she clearly saw the defendant run the red light and hit the pedestrian. the defendant did not cross-examine the woman, and she was excused as a witness and immediately left the jurisdiction. the defendant then called the woman's neighbor to testify that the woman had told him a week after the accident that the defendant had not run the red light. the pedestrian objects to the neighbor's testimony about the woman's statement. is the neighbor's testimony about the woman's statement admissible?
Answer: Most likely not.
Explanation: Most likely not. Why would they call the womens neighbor a week later after it happened? That does not make sense. The neighbor was no there to witness anything either.
which of the following powers is not granted to the president in article ii of the constitution?
The powers and responsibilities of the president are established in Article Two of the constitution, which also provides the procedures for choosing and dismissing the president.
Article Two also vests the executive branch's authority in the position of the president of the USA. The president and vice president are designated in Section 1 of Article Two, and both positions have a four-year term limit. The Vesting Clause of Section 1 and the Vesting Clauses of Articles One and Three establish the separation of powers between the three parts of government by stating that the executive branch of the government is established in the president. The authorities of the presidency are outlined in Section 2 of Article II, which also establishes that the president, among many other duties, is the military's commander-in-chief. The president has the authority to pardon people under this clause. Additionally, Section 2 calls for any executive department's "primary officer" to offer advise.
Learn more about constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/16051124
#SPJ4
Political systems, the systems of government in nations, differ from country to country. It is important to understand the nature of different political systems and develop an awareness of and appreciation for the significance of national differences.A political system is the system of government in a nation. Political systems are assessed according to two dimensions. The first is the degree to which they emphasize collectivism as opposed to individualism. The second is the degree to which they are democratic or totalitarian. These dimensions are interrelated and may share certain characteristics.Match the political system to the country:
The most important of these classification techniques is unquestionably Plato and Aristotle's attempt to categories the primary forms of government in terms of the number.
The governing structure of a nation is referred to as its political system. To analyse political systems, consider two dimensions. The first is the degree to which collectivism is emphasised at the expense of individuality. How democratic or dictatorial they are is the second aspect.
The political economics approach to the study of comparative politics is one way to look at this relationship. It implies that there is a link between politics and economics, and that this link works and presents itself in a number of different ways. It encompasses the entirety of this relationship.
Learn more about Political system.
https://brainly.com/question/19298230
#SPJ4
the list of previous owners from whom the present real estate owner derives his or her title is known as the
The list of previous owners from whom the present real estate owner derives his or her title is known as the chain of title.
What is chain of title?The chronology of previous transfers of title to a property is known as a chain of title. It acts as a historical ownership chronology for a property and is a useful tool for locating and documenting previous owners. The "chain" links the current owner to the property's original owner.an official document that details each owner of a certain property along with their date of ownership.It is a record of all papers and court cases pertaining to a particular piece of property.The owners of a piece of property are listed in a chain of title. From the very first owner all the way up to the present owner, it is sequential in nature.To learn more about property refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/9052855
#SPJ4
of the following, which is not a disciplinary action open to the commission if a licensee fails to provide disclosure or fails to adhere to the disclosure provisions set forth in the regulations?
After the disciplinary action is performed, a suitable follow-up must be conducted to determine whether the employee's behaviour has changed as a result of the punishment.
Following the implementation of the disciplinary action, a proper follow-up must be carried out to assess the employee's changed behaviour. A preliminary investigation into any allegations of misbehaviour is the first stage. An investigative report is created when information is acquired from numerous sources, such as witnesses to alleged incidents. If there has been misbehaviour, management should proceed to give the employee a written charge sheet. A charge sheet is a formal, legally binding document of allegation assures the accused. A meeting with the accused employee should be scheduled following the delivery of the charge sheet to the employee. He should be given the opportunity to make an explanation for the inappropriate behaviour.
To know more about assures refer :
brainly.com/question/30004401
#SPJ4
before any court can hear any dispute between miriam and the trucking company, it must have jurisdiction over the person or company against whom the suit is brought against or over the property involved in that lawsuit. in order for miriam to sue the trucking firm, she has to file the lawsuit in a court that has in personam jurisdiction over the defendant . the firm's headquarters are in georgia, although the company does business in florida, so georgia and florida have in personam jurisdiction over the trucking firm. miriam can sue the trucking firm in both georgia and florida state courts.
In order for a court to hear a dispute, it must have jurisdiction over the person or company against whom the suit is brought, or over the property involved in the lawsuit.
Do Miriam have rights to sue over the company?
In this case, Miriam wants to sue a trucking company. In order to do so, she must file the lawsuit in a court that has in personam jurisdiction over the defendant.
In personam jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to hear a case against a specific person or entity.
The trucking firm's headquarters are in Georgia, but the company does business in Florida.
Therefore, Miriam can sue the trucking firm in both Georgia and Florida state courts.
It is important to note that different states have different rules and laws, so Miriam may choose to file the lawsuit in one state over the other depending on which laws are more favorable to her case.
In summary, for Miriam to sue the trucking company, she has to file the lawsuit in a court that has in personam jurisdiction over the defendant.
The trucking firm is in Georgia and does business in Florida so both states have jurisdiction over the trucking firm. Miriam can sue the trucking firm in both Georgia and Florida state courts.
To learn more about lawsuit refer:
brainly.com/question/1065754
#SPJ4
the state constitution outlines that the judicial branch can check the legislative branch by
The state constitution outlines that the judicial branch can check the legislative branch by judicial review. It can declare those laws as unconstitutional.
The power of the Supreme Court of judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, was not originally present in the constitution itself. The Court had established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison.
The Government is divided into three branches by the constitution, namely, legislative, executive, and judicial. It is an important step because it gave specific powers to each of the branch and set up the doctrine called checks and balances.
To know more about judicial review refer to-
brainly.com/question/901665#
#SPJ4
kim was accused of securities fraud. during the government investigation, kim destroyed relevant documents. under 2002 federal legislation, kim:
Kim: may be punished with penalties and a maximum of 20 years in jail.
A penalty or the typical penalty for breaking the law: A three-year prison sentence is the maximum punishment under the law. In accordance with Laws 12 and 13, a player who violates a direct free kick rule inside their penalty area or while playing off the field results in a penalty kick. A penalty kick might result in an immediate goal. In a penalty shootout, each side is given five chances to score, and the team with the most successful kicks is crowned the winner. Since it has the potential to be the most significant, the fifth penalty is frequently considered the most significant.
Learn more about penalties here
https://brainly.com/question/28605893
#SPJ4
Which of the following international cybercrime laws includes an Article that provides for up to 5 years in prison and fines equivalent to about 800,000 U.S. dollars for a range of offences?
Saudi Arabia's anti- cyber crime law is an international cybercrime laws includes an Article that provides for up to 5 years in prison and fines equivalent to about 800,000 U.S. dollars for a range of offences.
For instance, a person could be charged under Saudi Arabia's Anti-Cyber Crime Law's Article 6 for "producing material infringing on public order, Islamic values, morality, or privacy." All of this is stated without any clarification of the terms used to define the impingement or the nature of the public values. Saudi Arabia's Specialized Criminal Court (SCC) ensures that the punishment is severe if the nation's Anti-Cyber Crime and Counter-Terrorism legislation permit the arrest of dissidents. The court was set up in 2008 to judge those accused of offenses related to terrorism. However since the Arab Spring of 2011, it has been used as a weapon to prosecute people for what would normally be considered peaceful protest.
To know more about anti- cyber crime law:
https://brainly.com/question/23988092
#SPJ4
----------------Complete question is below------------
Which of the following international cybercrime laws includes an Article that provides for up to 5 years in prison and fines equivalent to about 800,000 U.S. dollars for a range of offences?
a) Unauthorized computer access law
b) Saudi Arabia's Anti-Cyber Crime Law
c) EU Directive 2013/40
d) Jordan information systems and cyber crime law
Why did the British insist on keeping forts in American Territories?
They insisted on keeping forts in American Territories because the king was obliged to retain some official presence in America until Americans chose to repay their debts to Britain's merchants.
Why did the delegates from the colonies want to form a union?The 13 colonies banded together throughout the war to declare independence from British domination. The states were vastly different from one another, yet they understood that they needed to come together in order to thrive and prosper. The states collaborated to establish a centralized government. By refusing to hand up western forts as agreed upon in the Treaty of Paris during the Revolutionary War, Great Britain had transgressed American sovereignty. 2.) Great Britain started intercepting American maritime vessels and enlisting the people on board in her armed forces.They insisted on maintaining forts in American territories because the monarch was compelled to maintain an official presence in the country until Americans made the decision to pay back their debts to British traders.To learn more about American Territories refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/522832
#SPJ4
first minted in 2000, whose likeness was on the face-side of the u.s. dollar coin?
The dollar coin first minted in 2000 featured the likeness of Sacagawea, a Shoshone woman who helped guide the Lewis and Clark Expedition in 1804-1806.
What are the key points about Sacagawea and the coin:Sacagawea was only about 16 years old when she joined the expedition.She acted as an interpreter and guide for the explorers, helping them navigate through unfamiliar territories and communicating with Native American tribes they encountered.The Sacagawea dollar was first minted in 2000 and was produced until 2008.The coin was made of a manganese-brass alloy, which was intended to make it more durable and resistant to wear than previous dollar coins.The design on the coin was created by Glenna Goodacre, a sculptor known for her public monuments and memorials.The coin was intended to replace the Susan B. Anthony dollar, which had not been widely accepted by the public due to its similarity in size and color to the quarter.It was issued to celebrate the new millennium and the 100th anniversary of the Lewis and Clark Expedition.To learn more about Sacagawea and the coin refer:
brainly.com/question/11621203
#SPJ4
Singh sues Nuclear Processing Corporation, his former employer, for exposing him to radiation during his employment at its plant for processing nuclear power plant wastes. In the first claim for relief in his complaint he alleges that Nuclear negligently failed to recognize the risk that its employees were exposed to dangerous levels of radiation that could cause leukemia, because it had never adequately tested for elevated radiation levels. In the second claim for relief, he asserts that Nuclear was aware at the time of his employment that its facility exposed employees to elevated radiation levels that could cause leukemia, but failed to warn him of that risk or take steps to reduce it. In the third claim for relief, he alleges that after he had left Nuclear's employ, it learned of the risk of leukemia from the radiation levels its employees encountered at the facility, but failed to warn him so that he could obtain proper medical treatment and monitoring.a. Singh has pleaded inconsistently, because the three counts assert different versions of the facts regarding Nuclear's knowledge of the risk. This is permissible under Rule 8(d)(3), even if they can't all be true.b. Singh has pleaded inconsistently, under Rule 8(d)(3), but it is not permissible here, because there is no way that Singh could prove all three counts at trial.c. Singh hasn't pleaded inconsistently, since a jury might find any one of these three versions of his claim to be true.d. Singh has pleaded inconsistently, which is permissible under Rule 8(d)(3) unless he has substantially more evidence that one version of the claim, rather than the others, is true
The correct response is a. Singh has pleaded inconsistently, because the three counts assert different versions of the facts regarding Nuclear's knowledge of the risk. This is permissible under Rule 8(d)(3), even if they can't all be true.
Nuclear energy is the power stored in an atom's nucleus or core. Energy maintains the nucleus together in atoms, the minuscule building blocks of all matter in the universe. The tiny nucleus of an atom contains a huge quantity of energy. Nuclear weapons are the deadliest on earth. Millions of people might theoretically be murdered by completely destroying a city, putting the ecosystem and the lives of future generations in peril due to the long-lasting destructive effects. Such weapons are dangerous just by virtue of being there. Boiling water to create steam, which powers turbines to generate electricity, using nuclear power is a clean and effective process.
Learn more about Nuclear here
https://brainly.com/question/28081666
#SPJ4
