The Civil Rights Act, was passed in (1964), consummately U.S. legislation aimed to abandon humiliation based on race, complexion, religion, or nationality .
The Act abandons discrimination in public residence and federally financed programmes .
It is frequently called the most relevant U.S. law on civil rights since reformation (1865–77) and is a trademark of the American civil rights movement.
Title I of the act makes sure equal voting rights by eliminating registration requirements and procedures not accurate against minorities and the deprived ones. Title II prohibits differentiation or humiliation in places of public accommodation included in interstate commerce. Title VII abandons discrimination by trade unions, schools, or employers included in interstate commerce or following business with the federal government.
The latter section also implies humiliation on the basis of gender and structured a government agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), to impose these protocols.
To know more about Civil Rights Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30335064
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act, was passed in (1964), consummately U.S. legislation aimed to abandon humiliation based on race, complexion, religion, or nationality .
The Act abandons discrimination in public residence and federally financed programmes .
It is frequently called the most relevant U.S. law on civil rights since reformation (1865–77) and is a trademark of the American civil rights movement.
Title I of the act makes sure equal voting rights by eliminating registration requirements and procedures not accurate against minorities and the deprived ones. Title II prohibits differentiation or humiliation in places of public accommodation included in interstate commerce. Title VII abandons discrimination by trade unions, schools, or employers included in interstate commerce or following business with the federal government.
The latter section also implies humiliation on the basis of gender and structured a government agency, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), to impose these protocols.
To know more about Civil Rights Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30092721
#SPJ4
Ling is pondering how to answer the common interview question, “Do you have any questions about the company?”
What response demonstrates that Ling has done her research?
Ling is pondering how to answer the common interview question, the correct response is "Do you plan to expand into new product segments in the future?" Option D
What is an interview?Generally, An interview is a kind of guided discussion in which one party poses questions to the other, while the other participant responds with their responses.
The term "interview" is often used to refer to a dialogue that takes place between an interviewer and an interviewee in a one-on-one setting.
Have you given any thought to expanding into other product categories in the not-too-distant future?
This response reveals that Ling has conducted research on the firm and is interested in the future goals and expansion prospects of the business.
Read more about the interview
https://brainly.com/question/15128068
#SPJ1
t the cut up artwork is MORE valuable than it was before it was shredded? Why or why not?
200 words at least
The cut up artwork is MORE valuable than it was before it was shredded as- After selling for $1.4 million three years ago, the painting partially self-destructed. Sotheby's resold it for $25.4 million, breaking the artist's previous record.
By concealing a paper shredder in the frame of the painting and activating it remotely seconds after the work was sold for $1.4 million, Banksy appeared to be playing a practical joke on the art world.a piece of art that destroyed itself shortly after being purchased for a significant sum. A publicity stunt that garnered widespread attention, and perhaps a stunt that backfired since Banksy later acknowledged that the entire painting ought to have been destroyedTo know more about unity in artwork here
https://brainly.com/question/1504175
#SPJ1
compare and contrast this racism king experiences in the north and the south.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act were both made possible thanks in part to MLK. Each of these laws made it easier for African Americans to enjoy civil rights across the nation.
King encountered several challenges in his quest for equality. He was sent into custody for protesting more than 20 times. Several violent attacks on his person and property were made against him. Threatening phone calls were made to him, his house was destroyed and burned, and he was even stabbed. It was King's reluctance "to think that there are inadequate monies in the immense vaults of opportunity of this nation" that served as the foundation for the metaphor of a check owing to African Americans. "America, the wealthiest and most powerful nation in the world, may well lead the way in this revolution of values," he said.
To learn more about Civil Rights Act click the link below:
brainly.com/question/12447824
#SPJ4
2. What are three Latin American countries that were once owned by Spain?
3. Which ocean borders the western coast of Latin America?
Answer: puerto rico, mexico, panama.
south pacific ocean
What did Magellan’s crew achieve, according to the map? What did that show to others about the world?
first anti-slavery group in the colonies, lived in pennsylvania
First anti-slavery group in the colonies, lived in pennsylvania is the first American society which is dedicated to the cause of abolition and founded in Philadelphia on April 14, 1775.
The American Anti-Slavery society was founded in Philadelphia in December of 1833 that is 180 years ago.The Pennsylvania Anti-Slavery Society adopted a new constitution and named the Pennsylvania Society for promoting the Abolition of Slavery.
In 1780, Pennsylvania abolish slavery and became the first state in the country to pass an Abolition Act. In 1787, The Relief of Free Negroes Unlawfully Held in Bondage for Improving the Condition of the African Race.This law ended anti-slavery group through gradual emancipation.
Learn more about first anti slavery group click on the link here:
https://brainly.com/question/29995377
#SPJ4
The existence of the different branches of the united states government can be traced:____.a. from montesquieu to madisonb. from locke to jefferson c. from voltaire to jefferson d. from rousseau to madison
The existence of the different branches of the United States government can be traced from a) Montesquieu to Madison.
The French political philosopher, Charles de Montesquieu, in his work "The Spirit of the Laws" (1748) proposed the idea of a separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. He believed that dividing the powers of government would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. This idea of the separation of powers was influential in the drafting of the United States Constitution. James Madison, the "Father of the Constitution" and the fourth President of the United States, was particularly influenced by Montesquieu's ideas and incorporated them into the Constitution. The three branches of government, the executive, legislative, and judicial, were established in order to create a system of checks and balances among them, to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.
To know more about James Madison click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/4790222#
#SPJ4
Answer:
A.) from Montesquieu to Madison
Explanation:
got it right on the quiz
Describe two of the impacts World War I had at home during the war.
Answer:
The Home Front saw a massive change in the role of women, rationing, the bombing of parts of Britain by the Germans (the first time civilians were targeted in war), conscientious objectors and strikes by discontented workers. The whole nation was under the jurisdiction of DORA (Defence of the Realm Act)
Explanation:
♕︎ hope it helps <3What did the Supreme Court say about Executive Order 9066?.
The SCOTUS said that the evacuation order that Korematsu violated was valid, and that it was not necessary to address the constitutional racial discrimination issues in that case.
AKA, it was ruled to be constitutional
Shade the 1st territory gained black, 2nd green, 3rd light blue, 4th yellow, 5th 6th orange, 7th dark blue, and 8th white. Nearpod
Six tertiary colors (Ts): Red, Yellow, Orange, Green, Blue, Violet, and Red Violet are colours created by combining a primary with a secondary.
Which six tertiary colours are there?Six tertiary colors (Ts): Red, Yellow, Orange, Green, Blue, Violet, and Red Violet are colours created by combining a primary with a secondary.Combinations of basic and secondary colours make up tertiary hues. Red-orange, yellow-orange, yellow-green, blue-green, blue-violet, and red-violet are the six tertiary colours.Secondary hues: Due to the fact that they are compounds, primary and secondary colours together are referred to as tertiary or intermediate colours. You can blend colours to create hues like blue-green, blue-violet, red-orange, red-violet, yellow-orange, and yellow-green.Children should thus learn the six basic colour terms before learning the five secondary colour terms (orange, pink, purple, brown & grey).To learn more about tertiary colors refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29784292
#SPJ1
Look at the map of European alliances in 1914.
Map of European alliances in 1914. The Triple Alliance is shaded in orange with Italy and Austria-Hungary. The Triple Entente is shaded in pink with Great Britain, France, and Russia. The Balkans are outlined in purple.
What conclusion can be drawn from the map?
The Triple Alliance was the more powerful of the alliances.
The Triple Entente was trying to create an alliance with the Balkans.
The Triple Entente was sure to be defeated as its members were near each other.
The Triple Alliance would be fighting a two front war.
The conclusion that can be drawn from the map is that the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente were two separate and distinct alliances. The Triple Alliance, shaded in orange, consisted of Italy, Austria-Hungary, and Germany, while the Triple Entente, shaded in pink, consisted of Great Britain, France, and Russia. The map also shows that the Balkans, outlined in purple, were not part of either alliance.
It can be inferred that the Triple Alliance was the more powerful of the alliances as it included Germany, which was a major military power at the time. However, it could also be inferred that the Triple Alliance would be fighting a two front war as they would have to fight both Russia and France if they were to go to war against the Triple Entente.
It is not possible to say from the map if the Triple Entente was trying to create an alliance with the Balkans, or if the Triple Entente was sure to be defeated as its members were near each other. More information would be needed.
Did the Spanish kill the Incas?.
Answer:
The Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire, also known as the Conquest of Peru, was one of the most important campaigns in the Spanish colonization of the Americas.
...
Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire.
what were the challanges and dangers of organizing an integrated movement in an environment hostile to integration?
Answer:
More specifically, economic integration typically leads to a reduction in the cost of trade, improved availability of goods and services and a wider selection of them, and gains in efficiency that lead to greater purchasing power.
Explanation:
What does Article 5 of the Articles of Confederation mean?.
Article 5 of the Articles of Confederation, which was the first constitution of the United States, states that "The Congress, besides the authority before specified, shall have the power to appoint such other committees and civil officers as may be necessary for managing the general affairs of the United States under their direction."
This article is giving the Congress the power to appoint any necessary committees or civil officers to manage the general affairs of the United States. This means that the Congress has the authority to create and appoint individuals to positions of responsibility within the government, such as committees or officers, in order to manage the day-to-day operations of the country. This would include things like managing finances, overseeing the military, and enforcing laws.
Overall, Article 5 is giving Congress the power to create and appoint necessary officers and committees to manage the general affairs of the United States, and it is an important provision that gives Congress the means to effectively govern the country.
Demontrate your undertanding of the term arete, kalokagathia and ophroyne a they would have been undertood by an ancient Greek. For a country uch a the United State, what do you think contitute arete? (How can an entire country achieve it? What would that 'look like'?) (
Decribe a conflict in the United State right now that i keeping thi country from achieving arete. Thoroughly decribe the two oppoing ide (point of view, poition) of the conflict. Arete cannot be achieved without the practice of ophroyne. From your own peronal perpective, how would ophroyne be practiced by each of the two ide in the conflict you choe to dicu?
Arete. This crucial phrase, which is typically translated as "virtue," actually denotes something more like to "excellence."
What does arete mean in Greek? Arete.This crucial phrase, which is typically translated as "virtue," actually denotes something more like to "excellence."Arete, according to the Greeks, can also apply to any other form of perfection, including an athlete's physical condition or even a knife's sharpness. It is not just used to describe a person's moral or intellectual virtues.The word arete, which means excellence or virtue in ancient Greek, is used.When anything reaches its arete, it has attained its utmost possible excellence.If you live your life according to the arete principle, you'll be quality-driven in all you do and encounter.The son of mortal Peleus and the goddess Thetis, Achilles served as a shining example of the Greek virtue and excellence notion known as Arête throughout the entirety of The Iliad.To learn more about arete refer
https://brainly.com/question/10839426
#SPJ4
What type of government is an oligarchy?.
Oligarchies are forms of government in which the rule of a nation is exercised by a select group of individuals. A very small number of individuals are given authority by virtue of possessing a certain set of characteristics, such as money, heredity, and race.
In oligarchies, rulers often have a position of authority, and democratic principles and individual rights are not observed. An oligarchy is, in the broadest sense, a system of governance that is distinguished by the domination of a small number of individuals or families. In particular, the phrase was coined by the Greek philosopher Aristotle to contrast the concept of aristocracy, which is another word for the control of a nation by a select group of privileged individuals.
To learn more about Oligarchies click on the below link:
https://brainly.com/question/3710019
#SPJ4
On July 14, 1789, a group of French people attacked the Batille, which wa a prion, in Pari. Thi event market the tart of the French Revolution. If you were living in Pari in July 1789, would you have joined with the people and attacked the Batille? There i no right or wrong anwer. You can ay you would have joined the attack or you would not have joined the attack that tarted the French Revolution. Jut make ure you upport your repone with at leat three piece of evidence to upport your repone. PLEASE HELP
Majority of the Paris-based artisans and shop entrepreneurs who stormed the Bastille were revolutionaries. They belonged to the Third Estate, a group of French aristocrats. The assault was carried out by about 1000 troops.
The Bastille, a public jail on the eastern edge of Paris, was attacked by a vengeful mob on July 14, 1789. One of the turning points in the Revolution that followed was the occurrence, which made the prison a symbol of the monarchy's autocratic control.
The morning of July 14, the citizens of Paris took up arms from the Invalides Armory and marched toward the Bastille, an old royal castle.
Learn more about French Visit: brainly.com/question/26437501
#SPJ4
Although the Emancipation Proclamation did nothing to actually free enslaved people,
O Formerly enslaved people were to remain disenfranchised.
formerly enslaved people were never allowed to own land.
OIt publicly declared that the United States was committed to ending slavery.
Enslaved people were easily accepted into society.
It publicly declared that the United States was committed to ending slavery.
Explanation:The Emancipation Proclamation was given by Abraham Lincoln on January 1st, 1863, in the midst of the Civil War.
Freeing Slaves
The question is accurate in saying that the Emancipation Proclamation did not actually free any slaves. Specifically, the Emancipation Proclamation said that all slaves in rebelling states (the confederacy) were free. However, of course, the Confederacy did not listen to the proclamation, and thus, no slaves were actually freed. The most criticized part of the Emancipation Proclamation is that it allowed slavery to continue in border states. Remember that border states were pro-slavery states that sided with the Union.
Political Effects
Although the Emancipation Proclamation did not free slaves, it still had a large effect on the Civil War. It is important to note that prior to the Emancipation Proclamation, Great Britain imported weaponry and ships into the South in return for cotton. Additionally, Great Britain had already banned slavery within its own border. The Emancipation Proclamation showed the world, specifically Britain, that the Civil War was more than a domestic dispute; it was undoubtedly a war over slavery.
After the Emancipation Proclamation was passed, Great Britain stopped all trade with the pro-slavery South. This cut the Confederacy off from its allies. Since the South had almost no manufacturing of its own, the Confederacy began to run out of supplies very quickly.
What impact did the Munich Agreement have on Europe?.
The British and French Prime Ministers, Neville Chamberlain, and Edouard Daladier, signed the Munich Agreement with Nazi leader Adolf Hitler on September 30, 1938.
The Munich Agreement was an international agreement reached by Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy that emboldened Hitler's Germany. The agreement was solely intended to avoid war between European powers by allowing Nazi Germany, led by Adolf Hitler, to annex the Sudetenland, in an attempt to appease Nazi Germany before a conflict erupted.
However, considering the original motive, appeasement averted the outbreak of World War Two to a moderate extent in March 1939. When the German Army seized the rest of Czechoslovakia, leaving them unable to defend themselves and giving Hitler's expansionism a boost, appeasement became a symbol of failed diplomacy. This agreement which was meant to be peaceful instead failed to stop a war.
learn more about Munich Agreement at:
brainly.com/question/30123062
which of the following groups did NOT get taken down by the Spanish
A.) Inca
B.)Aztec
C.)Cahokia
D.)Cherokee
Cahokia was the group which was not taken down by the Spanish. The correct option is c.
What is Cahokia?The Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site is the site of a pre-Columbian Native American city directly across the Mississippi River from modern St. Louis, Missouri. This historic park lies in southwestern Illinois between East St. Louis and Collinsville. The park covers 2,200 acres, or about 3.5 square miles, and contains about 80 man-made mounds, but the ancient city was much larger.
At its apex around 1100 CE, the city covered about 6 square miles and included about 120 earthworks in a wide range of sizes, shapes, and functions.
Learn more about Cahokia, here:
https://brainly.com/question/15842755
#SPJ1
2. What warning about foreign nations does Washington give in his farewell address? Cite specific evidence from his address to support your answer (Paragraphs 11 & 12).
He argues that the country should avoid permanent alliances with all foreign nations, although temporary alliances during times of extreme danger may be necessary.
What warning about foreign nations does Washington give?While temporary alliances may be required in times of great danger, he contends that the government should avoid lasting alliances with any other countries. He claims that existing treaties should be upheld but not renewed. In his farewell speech, George Washington declared that he would not run for reelection a third time. – warning that the emergence of political parties and sectionalism pose a threat to the unity of the country. At the time, Federalists and Republicans were split between supporting France and Great Britain. Additionally, he strongly advised against any kind of long-term alliances with other countries and stated that the United States should only enter into short-term agreements with them in the case of truly dire circumstances.To learn more about Washington refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/26215904
#SPJ1
How Korematsu was Unconstitutional?.
korematsu’s attorneys appealed the trial court’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals, which agreed with the trial court that he had violated military orders.
Korematsu asked the Supreme Court of the United States to hear his case.On Tuesday, the Supreme Court had a chance to overturn the 1944 ruling if it rejected Donald Trump’s travel ban. Instead, the court condemned Korematsu.
The Court ruled in a 6 to 3 decision that the federal government had the power to arrest and intern Fred Toyosaburo Korematsu under Presidential Executive Order 9066 in February. After more than 73 years, the US Supreme Court finally overruled Korematsu v. US, the infamous 1944 decision upholding the internment of Japanese -Americans.
Korematsu became a civil-rights activist, lobbying Congress to pass the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, which gave compensation and an apology to former wartime detainees.
" To learn more about unconstitutional" at https://brainly.com/question/453546
How did entertainers contribute to the war effort check all boxes?.
Answer:
They entertained service men and women. They promoted enlistment and the purchase of war bonds.
competition between u.s. and soviets to develop superior weapons
Competition between U.S. and Soviets to develop superior weapons was termed as nuclear arms race.
The U.S. and Soviets arms race was a period of intense military competition between the two superpowers that lasted from the late 1940s to the end of the Cold War in 1991. It was characterized by a rapid increase in the number of nuclear weapons and other sophisticated military hardware on both sides.
The arms race was fueled by the fear of mutual destruction and the desire to gain a strategic advantage in the event of a war. The U.S. and Soviets competed to develop more powerful and accurate weapons systems, such as intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles.
To know more about Soviets, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/16320810
#SPJ4
How many insurrections were reported in the South before the Emancipation Proclamation was issued by President Lincoln?
Before President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, the South experienced almost 250 insurrections.
Before he issued the Emancipation Proclamation, what did Lincoln want?The Emancipation Proclamation was justified by President Lincoln as a defensive move to weaken the Confederacy. Lincoln made sure to apply the Emancipation Proclamation only to the Southern states that were in uprising in order to respect the boundaries of his power.
What deadline does Lincoln issue to the South? What acted did the South?President Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865) issued the Confederacy an ultimatum in the fall of 1862: either rejoin the Union while preserving slavery, or on January 1, 1863, he would free the slaves in the Confederate states.
To know more about Emancipation visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27237834
#SPJ1
after the civil war, a group that believed the south should be harshly punished and thought that lincoln was sometimes too compassionate towards the south is ?
After the civil war, a gathering that accepted the south ought to be cruelly rebuffed and imagined that lincoln was in some cases excessively caring towards the south is Extremist conservatives.
A large part of the Southern US was obliterated during the civil war. Ranches and manors were burned to the ground and their yields were destroyed. Likewise, many individuals had Confederate cash which was presently useless and the nearby legislatures were in disorder. The South required to have been reconstructed.
A large part of the south was in ruins; caught fire or desolated by the many fights and continuous strikes from Association Troopers. State legislatures were bad or nonexistent, and, surprisingly, after slaves were liberated, they were dealt with awfully.
Learn more about civil war:
https://brainly.com/question/28246218
#SPJ4
What are the three different categories of the types of rule?
The three different categories of the types of rule is Legislative rules, Procedural rules, Interpretative rules.
What is Legislative rules?A regulation that has the force of law and imposes new obligations on the parties it regulates, adopted by a government agency in compliance with the notice and comment procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act. known as the substantive rule. To "fill in the gaps" left by legislation, agencies utilize rules. They put a state or federal legislation or court ruling into practice, interpret it, or apply it. Unlike statutes, which are laws established by the state Legislature, rules are adopted by agencies.Legislative. The House and Senate, jointly known as the Congress, comprise the legislative branch. The legislative branch also has the authority to enact all laws, declare war, manage international and domestic trade, and set tax and spending priorities, among other things.To learn more about Legislative rules refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28362785
#SPJ1
What does the term “speculation” mean as it relates to the stock market crash?
In the context of the stock market, "speculation" refers to the practice of investing in stocks or other financial assets with the hope of making a profit, but with a higher degree of risk and uncertainty.
What is speculation?Speculation involves making decisions about the future value of a stock based on a combination of personal opinions, market trends, and other subjective factors.
During the stock market crash, speculation played a significant role in driving up stock prices and contributing to the overall instability of the market. Many investors were buying stocks on margin, meaning they were using borrowed money to invest, in the hope of making quick profits.
This speculation fueled an unsustainable stock market bubble that eventually burst, leading to the sharp decline in stock prices and widespread panic among investors.
Learn more on speculation at:
https://brainly.com/question/852688
#SPJ1
All of the following are reasons why we have a bicameral system in Congress EXCEPT:
to copy British Parliament,
Checks & balances:
To give architectural balance to the building,
the Connecticut (or Great) Compromise
Because both the House of Commons and the House of Lords participate in the creation of legislation, the UK Parliament is bicameral system.
What is the primary justification for our bicameral Congress?The founding fathers established Congress as a bicameral legislature as a defense against tyranny. They were worried about one government body getting too strong. This bicameral system divides power among two houses that act as a check and balance on one another rather than placing authority in a single body.
Why does India have a two-house government?The establishment of a bicameral legislature also served the institutional aim of allowing for reconsideration and wiser advice even after a law had been approved by the Lok Sabha. This is heavily influenced by the distribution of parties in both Houses.
To know more about bicameral system visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/9029250
#SPJ1
How did nationalism serve as a force for both unity and disunity in 19th century Europe?
asnwer
During the nineteenth century, nationalism emerged as a force which brought about sweeping changes in the political and mental world of Europe. The end result of these changes was the emergence of the nation-state in place of the multi-national dynastic empires of Europe.
Explanation:
