Which expression is equivalent to 3/2

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{4\dfrac{1}{2}:5\dfrac{2}{5}=5:6}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]4\dfrac{1}{2}:5\dfrac{2}{5}[/tex]

we convert a mixed number to an improper fraction

[tex]4\dfrac{1}{2}=\dfrac{4\cdot2+1}{2}=\dfrac{9}{2}\\\\5\dfrac{2}{5}=\dfrac{5\cdot5+2}{5}=\dfrac{27}{5}[/tex]

Therefore

[tex]4\dfrac{1}{2}:5\dfrac{2}{5}=\dfrac{9}{2}:\dfrac{27}{5}=\dfrac{9\!\!\!\!\diagup^1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{5}{27\!\!\!\!\!\diagup_3}=\dfrac{1}{2}\cdot\dfrac{5}{3}=\dfrac{1\cdot5}{2\cdot3}=\dfrac{5}{6}=5:6[/tex]

The ratio 4 1/5 to 5 2/5 is equivalent to the simplified fraction 7/9.

To write the ratio 4 1/5 to 5 2/5 as a simplified fraction, we need to convert both mixed numbers to improper fractions and then find their ratio.

Step 1: Convert the mixed numbers to improper fractions:

4 1/5 = (4 * 5 + 1) / 5 = 21 / 5

5 2/5 = (5 * 5 + 2) / 5 = 27 / 5

Step 2: Find the ratio by dividing the first fraction by the second fraction:

Ratio = (21 / 5) / (27 / 5)

Step 3: To divide by a fraction, multiply by its reciprocal:

Ratio = (21 / 5) * (5 / 27)

Step 4: Simplify the fraction:

Ratio = (21 * 5) / (5 * 27)

Ratio = 105 / 135

Step 5: Simplify the fraction further by dividing both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor, which is 15:

Ratio = (105 / 15) / (135 / 15)

Ratio = 7 / 9

Learn more about simplified fraction

https://brainly.com/question/78672

#SPJ3

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

20x + 40y = 61 this is the equation for the first party

30x + 30y = 64.50 this is the equation for the second party.

Solving steps:-

5x+3y=−4

y−2x=6

-->To solve a pair of equations using substitution, first solve one of the equations for one of the variables. Then substitute the result for that variable in the other equation.

5x+3y=−4,−2x+y=6

-->Choose one of the equations and solve it for x by isolating x on the left hand side of the equal sign.

5x+3y=−4

-->Subtract 3y from both sides of the equation.

5x=−3y−4

--> Divide both sides by 5.

x = 1/5(-3y - 4)

--> Multiply 1/5 −3y−4.

x = -3/5y - 4/5

--> Substitute -3y - 4/ 5 for x n the other equation, −2x+y=6.

-2 (-3/5y - 4/5) + y = 6

--> Multiply −2 times -3y - 4/ 5

6/5y + 8/5 + y = 6

--> Add 6y/5 to y

11/5y + 8/5 = 6

--> Subtract 8/5 from both sides of the equation.

11/5y = 22/5

--> Divide both sides of the equation by 11/5, which is the same as multiplying both sides by the reciprocal of the fraction.

y = 2

--> Substitute 2 for y in x= -3/5y - 4/5. Because the resulting equation contains only one variable, you can solve for x directly.

x = -3/5 x 2 - 4/5

--> Multiply -3/5 times 2.

x = -6 - 4/ 5

--> Add -4/5 to -6/5 by finding a common denominator and adding the numerators. Then reduce the fraction to lowest terms if possible.

x = -2

--> The equation is now solved.

Answer : x = -2, y = 2

Explanation : If you think this answer is good, please give "Brainliest" or rate/heart my answer. Hope this helps you.

Answer:

xy-11=5

ANSWER:

=16

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it helps to you

mark me as a brainlest please

Question 1

-----------------

Explanation:

To compute f(g(2)), we'll first need to find g(2).

Locate 2 in the x row. Then read straight down until you get to the g(x) row. You should find that g(2) = 4

This means f(g(2)) becomes f(4). We then repeat the same process as before. Locate 4 in the x row, read straight down til you get to the f(x) row to find that f(4) =  -9

Overall, we can say f(g(2)) = -9

We do the same set of steps to compute g(f(-1)). You should find that f(-1) = -1 and g(f(-1)) = g(-1) = -2

Lastly, we subtract the results we got:  

f(g(2)) - g(f(-1)) = -9 - (-2) = -9+2 = -7

==============================================

Question 2

-----------------

Explanation:

If you were to graph each equation, you should get what you see below.

The red and blue curves do not intersect in any way. We need an intersection point to have a solution. Because there are no intersections, we don't have any solutions. The system is considered inconsistent.

==============================================

Question 3

-----------------

Explanation:

x = number of scooters made and sold

Each scooter costs $150 to make. If you made x of them, then it costs 150x dollars. Then tack on the fixed cost of $2000 to get the expression [tex]150x+2000[/tex]

The cost function is [tex]C(x) = 150x+2000[/tex]. We'll subtract this from the revenue function R(x) to get the profit P(x)

[tex]\text{Profit} = \text{Revenue} - \text{Cost}\\\\P(x) = R(x) - C(x)\\\\P(x) = (400x-2x^2) - (150x+2000)\\\\P(x) = 400x-2x^2-150x-2000\\\\P(x) = -2x^2+250x-2000\\\\[/tex]

==============================================

Question 4

[tex]\left\{x\in \mathbb{R} \big| \ x \ne -2, x \ne 1\right\}[/tex]

-----------------

Explanation:

[tex]g(x) = \frac{1}{x+1}\\\\g(f(x)) = \frac{1}{f(x)+1}\\\\g(f(x)) = \frac{1}{x^2+x-3+1}\\\\g(f(x)) = \frac{1}{x^2+x-2}\\\\g(f(x)) = \frac{1}{(x+2)(x-1)}\\\\(g\circ f)(x) = \frac{1}{(x+2)(x-1)}\\\\[/tex]

I started with the outer function g(x) and replaced each x with f(x) in the second step. Then I plugged in f(x) = x^2+x-3 and simplified. Factoring the denominator is helpful to determine where the denominator becomes zero. Specifically, it happens when x = -2 and x = 1. These x values must be kicked out of the domain to avoid a division by zero error.

So we start off with the real number line, and poke holes at x = -2 and x = 1.

The notation [tex]x \in \mathbb{R}[/tex] means x is a real number. Then we tack on [tex]x \ne -2, x \ne 1[/tex]

Overall, the domain is [tex]\left\{x\in \mathbb{R} \big| \ x \ne -2, x \ne 1\right\}[/tex]

Let's see what happens if we tried plugging x = -1 into this composite function:

[tex](g \circ f)(x) = \frac{1}{(x+2)(x-1)}\\\\(g \circ f)(-1) = \frac{1}{(-1+2)(-1-1)}\\\\(g \circ f)(-1) = \frac{1}{(1)(-2)}\\\\(g \circ f)(-1) = \frac{1}{-2}\\\\(g \circ f)(-1) = -0.5\\\\[/tex]

We don't get a division by zero error, so x = -1 is allowed. The same can be said about any other x value as long as it's not -2 and not 1 either.

Answer:

G

Step-by-step explanation:

Therefore, the option [tex]G(-1,1)[/tex] is correct.

What is the inequality?

An inequality is a relation which makes a non-equal comparison between two numbers or other mathematical expressions.

Here given inequality equation

[tex]3x- 2y \geq -1[/tex]

When the points [tex](-1,1)[/tex] so it would be

[tex]3(-1)-2(1)\geq -1\\\\-3-2\geq -1\\\\-5\geq -1[/tex]

Hence, the option [tex]G(-1,1)[/tex] is correct.

To know more about the inequality

https://brainly.com/question/12679763

#SPJ6

The equation Q = 2 x M represents the relationship between question and time.

An equation is a combination of different variables, in which two mathematical expressions are equal to each other.

Given that,

Zack takes a test, in which he answers at rate of 2 question per minute.

Also, Q represents questions

And M represents minutes.

According to given condition,

In 1 minute, Zack answers 2 question,

In M minutes, Zack answers 2 x M question,

Total questions presented by Q,

Q = 2 x M.

The required relationship for M and Q is Q = 2 x M.

To know more about Equation on:

https://brainly.com/question/187506

#SPJ1

Answer:

I’m pretty sure it’s 588

Step-by-step explanation:

14.70 * 40 = 588

Answer:

perimeter=114

AREA= 308

Step-by-step explanation:

A^2 + B^2=C^2

then A+B=+C= P for triangle

52= triangle perimeter

rectangle:

(l+w)*2=p for rectangle=62

then add 52+62= 114

AREA- Triangle

b*h/2

22*10=220

220/2

= 110

AREA- Rectangle

l*w=A

22*9=198

ADD BOTH AREAS

198+110=308

HOPE IT HELPS

Answer:

I’m not sure what that means but I think it’s the one with the blue

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=5[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]/(4-[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex])

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi, these are not my strong point, Sorry if its incorrect.

6-[tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex](x+5)=4x

I first did 6-[tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex]

6/1 -2/3,  18/3-2/3 =16/3

[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex](x+5)=4x

I then expanded the bracket to get [tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]x+5[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]x+5[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]=4x

Then I took away [tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]x from both sides to get.

5[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]=4x-[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]x

I then factorised x out

5[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]=x(4-[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex])

I then divided by the bracket to get:

x=5[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex]/(4-[tex]\frac{16}{3}[/tex])

Answer:

4/7

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]6 - \frac{2}{3} (x + 5) = 4x[/tex]

U take -2/3 into the brackets

[tex]6 - \frac{2}{3} x - \frac{10}{3} = 4x[/tex]

Put all values with x on one side

[tex]6 - \frac{10}{3} = 4x + \frac{2}{3} x[/tex]

Ensure that they all have the same denominator so that u can add and subtract

[tex] \frac{18}{3} - \frac{10}{3} = \frac{12}{3} x + \frac{2}{3} x[/tex]

[tex] \frac{8}{3} = \frac{14}{3} x[/tex]

Drop the denominator since they both have the same denominator

[tex]8 = 14x[/tex]

divide both sides by 14

[tex] \frac{8}{14} = \frac{14}{14} x[/tex]

[tex]x = \frac{4}{7} [/tex]

Answer: 1 pound = 1.03

Step-by-step explanation:

not sure what you wanted from this but here are possible answer

Hey there!

When you hear or see the word “per” in math, think of the question/word problem telling you to find the “for each”. This basically mean you’re dividing. So, let’s divide your numbers from each other.

$5.15/5 lb

= 5.15 ÷ 5 lb

= 5.15 ÷ 5 lb

= $1.03

Therefore, your answer SHOULD be: $1.03

Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day!

~Amphitrite1040:)

Answer:

The package label stated that the net weight is 381.8g If every package has ... brand of candies have a mean weight of 0.8616g and a standard deviation of ...

Answer:1+1

Step-by-step explanation:

1+1=2

Answer:

67/20 as an improper fraction, 3 7/20 as a mixed number and, 3.35 as a decimal

Hope this helped :)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

48

Step-by-step explanation:

There are various multiples of 6 that are greater than 40, but less than 90. Including 42, 48, 54, 60, 66, 72, 78, and 84. :)

Answer:

Observational study

Step-by-step explanation:

The answer would be 6 I belive make sure to double check it

Prime numbers after 167, 118, 82, 57, 41, are:

37, 31, 29, 23, 19, 17, 13, 11, 7, 5, 3, 2

Prime numbers are numbers that only have two factors, 1, and themselves.

Apart from these factors, no number can divide them without a remainder.

By observation, the numbers 167, 118, 83, 57, 41, are written in descending order.

This means that the prime number to be chosen will be lesser than 41

Prime numbers lesser than 41 are:

2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37

Learn more on prime numbers here: https://brainly.com/question/145452

Answer:

54 X 68=3672

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]x = 4 \\ 4 + 5(4) - 8 = 16[/tex]

Answer:

x=3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-9/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope is equal to the change in y, over the change in x, or rise over run.

x, is the run

y, is the rise

You can substitute the coordinate numbers on the equation to find the slope. which is y2-y1/x2-x1

m= 17-(8)

——

2-(6)

Your answer will be -9/4 (it doesn’t matter where the negative goes, and there’s a negative because 2-6= -4)

Hope this helps.

Answer:

it's 4

Step-by-step explanation:

I hope it helps .....

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

2+2=4

I'll give a real world problem to help you understand. So pretend that you have 2 cookies on your plate and your sibling has 2 cookies on their plate too. If your siblings gives you their 2 cookies and you add them to your plate, how many cookies are on your plate now? There should now be 4 of them!

Does this help?

Applying the given probabilities, it is found that there is a 0.42 = 42% probability of watching a movie today.

These following probabilities involve a movie being watched today:

Hence, adding them:

[tex]p = 0.5(0.6) + 0.3(0.4) = 0.3 + 0.12 = 0.42[/tex]

0.42 = 42% probability of watching a movie today.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/14398287

Using the z-distribution, it is found that since the value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value for the right-tailed test, there is sufficient evidence to support the principal’s claim.

At the null hypothesis, it is tested if they are not above average, that is, their mean is of 500 or below, hence:

[tex]H_0: \mu \leq 500[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if they are above average, that is, their mean is of more than 500, hence:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 500[/tex]

We have the standard deviation for the population, thus, the z-distribution is used. The test statistic is given by:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

The parameters are:

For this problem, the values of the parameters are: [tex]\overline{x} = 541, \mu = 500, \sigma = 100, n = 50[/tex]

Hence, the value of the test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{541 - 500}{\frac{100}{\sqrt{50}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = 2.9[/tex]

The critical value for a right-tailed test, as we are testing if the mean is greater than a value, with the standard 0.05 significance level, is of [tex]z^{\ast} = 1.645[/tex].

Since the value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value for the right-tailed test, there is sufficient evidence to support the principal’s claim.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/25728144